This thread is a hot mess. People are up in arms mad at Tesla for whatever reason and using this thread to post. There are issues that need to be resolved with Tesla's relations with the owner community and class action is good to make sure they don't forget an expensive issue, but saying that Tesla doesn't have the right to audit their cars to make sure they all have the features they were sold with is redonk
Following the Model 3 threads for about 4 years now I have seen LOTS of cars that magically had Free Supercharging at purchase. Owners were posting here asking why were they different. And eventually, they all got corrected and those individuals don't have it anymore. Tesla didn't come to them demanding payment for the Free charging they got, they just don't have it anymore.
Suggesting that a car's original Monroney sticker is inviolate is redonk too, unless there is a second sticker created for the used car sale there are zero reasons for Tesla to include software features from the original purchase after they have bought the car back. Reset to zero and let the customer add the features they want. This way the car can be sold cheaply but Tesla can continue to make money on it, just like they are doing with the acceleration upgrades they are now offering.
Now, this is ONLY if Telsa buys the car back, private sales should not be reset opportunities, and there needs to be communication between Tesla and auction buyers as to what features are enabled. But I find used car dealers are pathetic at selling Teslas and asking if they have EAP will be usually met with blank stares. This is why it is often worth buying directly from Tesla.
Since the used dealer is uneducated I can see going back to them for redress. "This car was sold with these features, now they are gone". This is where having a second Monroney for the used car sale would be useful.