rfmurphy81
Member
Some great ideas. I'm particularly interested in more reporting and aggregation for vampire drain.
-
Want to remove ads? Register an account and login to see fewer ads, and become a Supporting Member to remove almost all ads.
Yes, there is a page called Tagged Drives which allows you to search through drives based on starting and ending dates. You can specify to only show drives which you have tagged as a certain category, such as Business. Or you leave category search blank and it will show all drives during that period. There's also a export button to export the found results data into a CSV file.
Everything should be in place for customizing the data tables in the drives, charges, sleeps, idles and raw data detail pages. Each row will contain the time and API connection status first, and then you can customize the next 15 columns however you want. Each of these tables has a default layout until you edit them by clicking on 'Edit Layout' and customizing them. You can also reset them back to the default if needed.
Cyclone
Cyclonic Member ((.oO))
If nobody else has reported anything, then it is likely something local to my car preventing it from sleeping. I'll play around with it first. Thanks!
Cyclone
Cyclonic Member ((.oO))
Nice layouts! Now all I need is 0000156: Add Charge Cost By Location - TeslaFi Bug Tracker and I'm good till you decide to dig into the automation pieces (I think you already have some feature requests for those out there). 
rfmurphy81
Member
This is awesome! I noticed you also relabeled the columns and minimized the number of defaults. Great job.
Sleep behaviour of my car has changed also, I think. I set-up deep sleep for my workplace on 11 Jan, and my car slept for the entire day that day. The next day, my car upgraded and now it's sleeping for up to 12 minutes, then idling for around 30 minutes before sleeping briefly again.
Last 'good' sleep: 11 Jan 2017
Software upgraded to 2.52.22 on 12 Jan 2017
Possible that it's coincidence, as I only have one data point before the upgrade.
TeslaFi Car ID: 488
What are you looking at that tells you it's sleeping? I use Deep Sleep too and it always says "online" but it only polls at whatever frequency I have it set to (in my case I use the default of 30 minutes) and I only lose about 1% per night.
11-Jan-2017...
a sample of today...
Car slept for 3hrs 51mins today and was idle for 13hrs 39 mins. 14miles range loss in total, mostly while idling.
I see thanks. I think if you have Always Connected = On it's always going to look like it never sleeps. From my experience if you have it set to off its best to use the other two sleep modes instead of Deep Sleep.
True. I did have it set to off. I haven't checked whether the sw upgrade has reset it to on, but since it takes a minute for the mobile app to connect, I think its still set off.
HankLloydRight
No Roads
I'd like to repeat a very minor request I made back in the early days. Currently the "efficiency" value is calculated by dividing miles driven by rated miles used, as such:
64.45 Miles Driven / 75.39 Rated Miles Used = 85.5% Efficiency
But I really can't use the 85.5% number for much.
But (this is for me and maybe other people), if we invert the calculation to calculate "inefficiency" as such:
75.39 Rated Miles/64.45 Miles Driven Used - 1 = 17% inefficiency
That's a number I can wrap my head around.
That means that if the assumed 100% efficient baseline is 300 Wh/m, then if I'm 17% inefficient on a trip, I'd likely consume about 350 Wh/m if I take the same trip again (300*1.17=350).
Likewise, as the % inefficiency goes down, so does the Wh/m -- they move in lockstep. The Efficiency number moves in inverse to Wh/m, which I think, is counterintuitive and not terribly useful in real-world, calculate-in-your-head numbers.
I'd guess you wouldn't want to display both, but I'd sure like to see "inefficiency" displayed somehow, maybe as an option or switch, both on individual drives as well as the daily summary.
Thanks.
64.45 Miles Driven / 75.39 Rated Miles Used = 85.5% Efficiency
But I really can't use the 85.5% number for much.
But (this is for me and maybe other people), if we invert the calculation to calculate "inefficiency" as such:
75.39 Rated Miles/64.45 Miles Driven Used - 1 = 17% inefficiency
That's a number I can wrap my head around.
That means that if the assumed 100% efficient baseline is 300 Wh/m, then if I'm 17% inefficient on a trip, I'd likely consume about 350 Wh/m if I take the same trip again (300*1.17=350).
Likewise, as the % inefficiency goes down, so does the Wh/m -- they move in lockstep. The Efficiency number moves in inverse to Wh/m, which I think, is counterintuitive and not terribly useful in real-world, calculate-in-your-head numbers.
I'd guess you wouldn't want to display both, but I'd sure like to see "inefficiency" displayed somehow, maybe as an option or switch, both on individual drives as well as the daily summary.
Thanks.
n2mb_racing
Active Member
I've got a bug. I'm charging at 240V @ 12A and logged efficiency over 100%.
kWh Used
9.7 kWh
kWh Added
9.86 kWh
Charge Efficiency
101.3 %
kWh Used
9.7 kWh
kWh Added
9.86 kWh
Charge Efficiency
101.3 %
Will do. I need create a new settings table to store front end settings so I can alter it at will. Currently my settings table is shared with the data logger which is accessed a minimum of 400 times a minute and is not ideal to add preferences when I want to, since I have to stop logging for a minute or two. I'll get to that soon and include this.
Looks like the API possibly had approximately a 10 minute gap in data during the start of the charge. Since the charger kWh is based on the live data it missed the incoming kWh from the charger. I just added a couple calculations to determine the difference in time between the last good data point and the current data point it's dealing with. If it determines that it's missing data points it will fill the missing charger data in with the newest good info. At least that's the theory, I put it in place and it doesn't appear to have broken anything else but it's a significant change so we'll see. It's actually something that should have been in place already to properly catch this type of thing. I only put it in place for home charges for now.
HankLloydRight
No Roads
Similar threads
