Fourdoor
Active Member
All right, thanks for the clarity. Yep, they are there to sell cars and saying "hey, by the way, you might only get half of that announced range" wouldn't help. The truth is, it wouldn't be true either. Some people around me are saying they are getting the EPA. They must be driving very gently At best I do 80% of rated in summer and 50-60% in Quebec winter. But I understand why.
As said, I wholeheartedly agree that more information is required. I do see a lot of people that wouldn't listen to it in any case and would end up frustrated, but at least if the information would be more easily obtainable and it would help a good proportion of people.
Since I've had my car I've made it an obligation to myself to properly inform anyone that's interested. I try not to paint it as rainbows and unicorns but instead make it reasonable. That means I don't paint the darkest, worst picture either. But the real information is nuanced and needs a lot of detail, something not many people are willing to put up with.
The range rating for EV's needs to be revamped completely, trying to do it like ICE vehicles was a mistake to begin with. I don't see this ever happening, but in an ideal world we would get a three season two drive cycle rating with specified exterior temperature and specified climate control settings. The three seasons winter / inclement (cold temperatures), spring and fall (moderate temperatures) and summer (warm temperatures) with a city drive cycle for each season and a steady high speed drive cycle for highway range for each season.
My first problem with Tesla is they game the system as hard as possible to get the longest EPA range possible. When a Porsche Taycan with 240 miles of EPA range can travel 297 miles at 70 mph and a 2020 Tesla MY LR with an EPA range of 316 miles goes 276 miles at 70 mph you know something is rotten in Denmark. On paper the Porsche is a joke with 76 miles less range than the 2020 Tesla MY LR... but in the real world it performs significantly better (21 miles more range).
My main problem is that this "get the best fantasy range on paper we can" mindset hurts Tesla more than it helps when people compare real world range of EV's.
The statement that "Tesla has the best range and fastest charging" used to be true, on paper AND in the real world. That is no longer the case. Back when it was true people would say "it doesn't match EPA range but it is still better than a Leaf or Bolt" Now with all the competition that isn't good enough. When a manufacturer provides MORE range than the EPA estimate it impresses people, when they provide less range than the EPA estimate people see it as (at best) exaggeration and excuses.
Keith