Not true. This space is ginormous!!...
View attachment 874820
If it can't recognise and get in that, I question the usefulness of the feature!
The BMW did move further apart between the Tesla's various attempts, presumably to help it, but was in exactly the same place between the final Tesla attempt and the Hyundai's successful attempt. The Tesla was parked pretty much exactly in the same place the Hyundai was parked. Compare the position of the right front wheels with that pothole/depression on the ground in front of them - if anything the Hyundai is a little further apart giving the Tesla a bigger gap, but there is only inches in it at most.
View attachment 874819
No need to make excuses. It is what it is - it was a fair test and Tesla failed in this case. Hopefully Tesla improves over time! Not that I'm ordering EAP anyway as it's pretty useless currently where I live, and even more useless without USS!
EDIT: In fact if I'm not mistaken the Tesla can't perform perpendicular parking as in this test anyway, so it didn't stand a chance! According to the user manual it requires to be able to see three clear lines to be able to recognise a parking space - it can't just park between two vehicles in unmarked spaces. I believe this is just the current state of the Vision autopark, while the old USS-only autopark could
only park between two cars (needing them for reference) and couldn't park on empty but marked spaces at all. They just need to get the Vision USS replacement up and running then tie it all together so it can perpendicular park both between vehicles in unmarked spaces and in marked spaces with or without other vehicles present. Five years then