You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Curious timing of NHTSA's investigation into the first death using MBLY's technology on the eve of their major deal with Intel & BMW.MBLY up pretty nice after the Intel deal.
MBLY up pretty nice after the Intel deal.
Interesting that the initial sp decrease in Mbly was no where near % drop in tslaYear over year growth in units shipped and revenue was over 60%, gross margins on EyeQ processors are over 75%, and the company had free cash flow of over 30M for last quarter:
Mobileye N.V. - Mobileye Announces First Quarter 2016 Financial Results
This company has real potential if its technology becomes dominant in self-driving cars.
Interesting that the initial sp decrease in Mbly was no where near % drop in tsla
I made 10% with mobleye but am out now. They only believe in camera based solution to autonomous driving. Implies camera can overcome heavy fog, rain and snow. Any solution not accounting for adverse conditions is not credible. They have no plans for other modes. I also do not understand the alliance with Intel. Mobileye makes their chips. Why ally with chip maker.Mobileye shares climb after second-quarter earnings beat
MBLY delivered a healthy quarterly earnings report, which sent shares over $50.
And then Mobileye announced that it would no longer be working with Tesla beyond Mobileye's EyeQ3 product: Mobileye won’t supply Tesla self-driving tech beyond current EyeQ3 processor
Sending shares tumbling 10% premarket, despite Mobileye's qualification that Tesla's business was not substantial to their finances.
Mobileye's EyeQ4 is slated to begin production in 2018.
I made 10% with mobleye but am out now. They only believe in camera based solution to autonomous driving. Implies camera can overcome heavy fog, rain and snow. Any solution not accounting for adverse conditions is not credible. They have no plans for other modes. I also do not understand the alliance with Intel. Mobileye makes their chips. Why ally with chip maker.
I agree they do not offer a complete solution but in cc in the past they have stated they believe in complete camera only solution. I do believe stock will run for a while but they ultimately will loseI have not gotten the impression from Mobileye that they believe in "camera only" for autonomous driving. The company has chosen to focus on visual processing algorithms and hardware optimized to run those algorithms. They do not provide a full solution.
.
I agree they do not offer a complete solution but in cc in the past they have stated they believe in complete camera only solution. I do believe stock will run for a while but they ultimately will lose
Lose to whom, and lose when?
Tesla is the obvious competitor, given Elon's statements about wanting to push for Autonomous Driving as soon as possible. But even if Tesla were to develop a complete system that is better than Mobileye, that doesn't necessarily mean that other car companies would adopt it. Tesla has opened up its patents and any car company could have announced partnership on Superchargers, but so far there are no takers.
I believe it does not matter whether MobileEye believes in a camera-only solution or not. The fact of the matter is that almost all car makers are using a combination of sensors, but they are buying MobilEye visual processing units for the "seeing" component. They don't have to provide complete solutions to keep on growing very quickly.
The danger is that some other supplier will come up with a better visual processing unit and then sell a complete self-driving package. That's what George Hotz's company Comma.ai is trying to do. Among traditional car suppliers, I'm not seeing much that is demonstrably better.
If Hotz's product starts to gain traction and prove itself to be better, then I would say MobilEye's long term prospects are less promising.
As far as I know MBLY valuation as it stands today is not based on delivering a small portion of the package but offering the full package. As I understand, a lot of MBLY valuation is based on a) Having a fully autonomous solution b) MBLY will get a cut in revenues gained through fully autonomous business models (ride sharing, autonomous goods transport and such).
If Tesla gets to fully autonomy much ahead of MBLY, in this winner-takes-all economic world, there will be very little left for the other players in the new autonomous business models. That is especially true if competitors are competing with ICEs. But in a nutshell Tesla will build cars capable of going a million miles, with negligible fuel/maintenance costs, in such a way that the total cost of operation would be lower than just the fuel costs of ICE. So in the long run all present automakers are all dead. There would be only a few new age transportation companies that run the world, to a large degree and maybe some small niche markets for ICEs where for whatever reason fully autonomy doesn't work (utterly poor roads).
Don't want to rehash everything Julian used to say about this.
My overall position on Mobileye is that the company has potential, but that autonomous driving is a product area that is still very much in its early stages.
There is no guarantee that Mobileye will become a dominant supplier in the future, but I also don't take it as a given that Tesla or George Hotz will necessarily beat them or cause them to become extinct. Anyone buying MBLY should keep close tabs on the company and its competition to get a sense of where things are going.
I was wondering the same thing.What happened to SEDG?