bkp_duke
Well-Known Member
Um, as a physician you have the duty to do what's best for your patients. Making your own economic analysis, regardless how trivial it seems to you, to self-justify denying medication is exactly the issue.
A couple of tenets of the Hippocratic Oath (I teach and differentiate the Hippocratic Oath from other professions' ethical tenets.):
I will apply, for the benefit of the sick, all measures [that] are required, avoiding those twin traps of overtreatment and therapeutic nihilism.
I will remember that I do not treat a fever chart, a cancerous growth, but a sick human being, whose illness may affect the person's family and economic stability. My responsibility includes these related problems, if I am to care adequately for the sick.
Doctor, who exactly appointed you JUDGE of who is "abusing" the system???
I am not restricting access to anything, myself and the 90% of physicians that do not write prescriptions for OVER THE COUNTER medications simply will not provide a cost-saving benefit that is not available to private insurance patients.
You can appoint your self judge and jury, and I really don't care, but there is nothing immoral (the patients can go buy a $3 bottle of Tylenol WITHOUT a prescription like everyone else) or illegal or against my oath.
I have NEVER prevented anyone from obtaining a prescription for non-OTC medication that was necessary to treat any medical condition.
You can disagree all you like, call me names, but you should realize that your doctors likely won't do this either. Go ahead, ask them.