No criticism needed, because it’s NOT true. Almost ten times more natural gas impacted than wind. That’s the truth. Gas is used for heating and electrical generation, thus LESS is available for electricity in winter vs summer. Nobody is perfect, but don’t mistake that for blatant biased reporting against renewables in the Texas media. After the February 2011 event, ERCOT put out a press release praising the wind generators for producing MORE than scheduled and blamed the event on thermal generators that went off-line because of freezing conditions, not enough gas pressure in the pipe lines, etc. (my Google fu wasn’t able to find it just yet). The same thing is happening today. That’s the truth. Sorry, if you don’t “believe”.
I said "disproportionately impacted".
NG generation in Texas accounts for 53% of the total energy mix, wind is half of that at 23.3% (www.ercot.com/content/wcm/lists/219736/ERCOT_Fact_Sheet_2.12.21.pdf). But remember that's just capacity as wind doesn't blow all the time however under normal operating conditions a NG plant can. What's more telling is the energy use mix where wind is only 20% of the total. As of December 2019 there is 24GW of wind capacity in Texas and half of it is offline due to freezing (Historic winter storm freezes Texas wind turbines). That means out of the 30GW of offline capacity about a third or a quarter of it is wind when it should be only one fifth. Thus if Texas was more heavily invested in wind the energy deficit would be even worse thus "disproportionately impacted". None of this to say NG plants are foolproof, clearly they're having big problems too. Let's not kid ourselves that wind is a panacea.
Ok, if you’re willing to pay ten times the current costs, and wait at least 10+ years, then go ahead and wait for a nuclear plant (just like in GA). Sorry, it ain’t happening. The solution right now is insulation, sealing, better windows, and net zero building codes. For me, I’ve taken things into my own hands and added a foot of insulation in the attic and new low-e windows when I first bought my 1960s house. I’m sitting right now, with a foot of snow everywhere outside 20F overnight and perfectly warm enough with the heat off every night. Max low inside gets to 58F, when it gets to zero outside. Just replaced the heat pump with higher efficiency and run it during the warmest part of the day (12-4pm), then the house holds the heat well enough until the next day. I have extremely cheap, stable, underground-serviced power that is 100% hydro, so I don’t feel the need for solar or PowerWalls. If I was still in TX, I would definitely go with solar/PW and build net zero (might require an out-of-state contractor).
Nothing happens overnight. All of the "upgrades" you mention will take years at scale as well and have their own challenges. Like everything else a wholistic, balanced approach provides the best outcomes. Nuclear power has come a long way and distributed nuclear holds great promise. I hope our new administration sees that opportunity to move us to a greener and more stable energy future.