RobStark
Well-Known Member
Looks like Gov Rosselló is suggesting starting on a smaller scale on the islands of Vieques y Culebra
Implying he wants to see it work in reality in Puerto Rico before signing bigger contracts for all of Puerto Rico.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
FWIW, in just one week, Norway counts already more Model S registrations than October 2016:
Tesla Registration Stats
If this rate continues, it's gonna be a great month.
Yes, I like him too. It's worth taking note of his Tipranks standing: #204 out of 4698 analysts, with an average return of +17.6%.
Guess what is the average return of John Lovallo of Merryl Lynch? -21.6% (#4596 out of 4698).
How about that of David Tamberrino at Goldman? -18.4% (#4502 out of 4698).
My 2c: anything below $320 is very unlikely at this point. I have a price in mind for significantly increasing leverage, and it's not too far from that.
https://jalopnik.com/tesla-model-3-production-is-jammed-up-because-parts-are-1819197180
Update, 6:30 p.m.: A Tesla spokesperson sent along a statement to Jalopnik that reiterates some of the earlier points in the company’s comment to the WSJ.
'This reporting is fundamentally wrong and misleading. We are still in the beginning of our production ramp, but every Model 3 is being built on the Model 3 production line, which is fully installed, powered on, producing vehicles, and increasing in automation every day. However, every vehicle manufacturing line in the world has both manual and automated processes, including the Model S and Model X line today. Contrary to the Journal’s reporting, this is not some revelation. As we’ve always acknowledged, it will take time to fine-tune the line for higher volumes, but as we have also said, there are no fundamental issues with Model 3 production or its supply chain, and we are confident in addressing the manufacturing bottleneck issues in the near-term. We are simply working through the S-curve of production that we drew out for the world to see at our launch event in July. There’s a reason it’s called production hell.'
I wonder if Tesla's shipping to int'l markets more to keep 200,000th U.S. delivery to after march 31.
Well this means the hell is really bad and the chances of the non employees delivery in 2017 seems unlikely.
Well this means the hell is really bad and the chances of the non employees delivery in 2017 seems unlikely.
FWIW, in just one week, Norway counts already more Model S registrations than October 2016:
Tesla Registration Stats
If this rate continues, it's gonna be a great month.
I wonder if Tesla's shipping to int'l markets more to keep 200,000th U.S. delivery to after march 31.
This would throw off Norway to Gonzalez extrapolation. Last quarter, for example, showed highest number of global deliveries ever, but wasn't as huge as Norway data would have led one to beleive if using simple extrapolation.
Nevertheless, Norway delivery number is a good data point to have, while keeping in mind its limitations.
As for the question of whether Tesla is shipping more to international markets, the answer is no. Deliveries to US as a percentage of total are **increasing** in 2017, quite significantly in Q3. Apologies if this throws off VA thoughts to reality extrapolation.
View attachment 252429
Thank you for sharing that data. I think what I was trying to say only applies to 4Q17 and 1Q18, if Tesla is trying to delay 200,000th U.S. delivery, so let's see how your table extends into subsequent months. Please keep us updated.
You would easily see this manifesting itself even before the Q4 delivery numbers are available. If Tesla artificially reduces deliveries to US, as you suggest they might, the US backlog would grow disproportionately and estimated delivery time for US would grow much longer than for overseas deliveries. I think that it is unlikely that Tesla will utilize this strategy.
If Tesla only manages to ship, say, 10,000 Model 3's in 2017, then we're at 170,000 total going into Q1. Say S+X is another 15,000 in Q1, and Model 3 is then running at 4,000/week. That's 45,000 to 50,000 Model 3's. It might make sense to have 15,000 Model 3's to U.S., and then ship 30 to 35k overseas. Then as they hit the full 5,000/week by end of Q1, they then can ship 120,000 Model 3's in Q2 and Q3. In this scenario, 150,000 Model 3's in the U.S. with full tax credit and an extra 15-20k S/X also get the full tax credit.
But if the ramp is better... 25,000 Model 3's in 2017, then 185,000 total going to Q1, then it is nearly impossible to avoid crossing in Q1. At that point, it just makes sense to ship as many as possible in the U.S.