brian45011
Active Member
thank you. helps a lot. i had put together the same thing from the 10k not having seen anything else. i thoroughly appreciate your validating that work.
the implications to me are 1. that gross margins have a lot of room to go higher as gigafactory output scales. 2. q4 revenue was almost equal to first 3 quarters combined, which is fantastic growth.
Others had reached similar conclusions:
"Between Tesla's 10-K filing and the Q4 investor letter, we learned some key facts about Tesla's energy storage business as well as the SolarCity segment post deal close. Here are just a couple of Q4 highlights. Remember, the SolarCity deal closed on November 21, so we're talking about less than half a quarter of results:
- Energy storage and generation revenues: $131.385 million.
- Energy storage and generation Q4 gross margin: 2.7%.
- SolarCity added $84.1 million of revenues in Q4.
- SolarCity added $67.0 million to the cost of revenues in Q4.
My calculations showed:
ENERGY GENERATION AND STORAGE:
Increase CY16 over CY15:
SCTY-related Revenues $84.1 MM Storage (including SCE installation?) Revenues $82.8 MM
SCTY related COGS: $67.0 MM Storage (including SCE installation?) COGS $99.0 MM
SCTY GM $17.1 MM (+20.3%) Storage (including SCE installation?) GM- $16.2 MM (-19.6%).
“The (SG&A) increase includes $74.3 million related to SolarCity.” ~$10 million in R&D for SCTY?? a $22.0 million increase in interest expense associated with SolarCity’s indebtedness, financing obligations and capital lease obligations.
I think 4th quarter TE figures include the 80 MWh installation for SCE at Mira Loma . It was not commissioned by SCE until mid-January but it appears Tesla met the revenue recognition criteria, and the period between late December and mid-January was for SCE's start-up testing. The SH letter stated: "98 MWh of energy storage deployed in Q4."
Last edited: