You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I know how networks are setup, packets routed between routers, internet layers, etc...but I haven't been in that area for so long. Anyone on here know how to trace the IP addresses or packets back to certain MAC address and find the physical address of the server/computer?The FUD has gone to 11. I was surprised when the forces of FUD infiltrated Bloomberg to run dishonest hit pieces. Now they've inflitrated Vox with a blatantly dishonest piece which I am not even going to link to.
It's worth figuring out who's behind this campaign, because I'm starting to have trouble believing that it's coincidental that the FUD is ramping up so high right now. Some of the authors can probably be tracked back to their money suppliers; this is smelling like corruption.
I know how networks are setup, packets routed between routers, internet layers, etc...but I haven't been in that area for so long. Anyone on here know how to trace the IP addresses or packets back to certain MAC address and find the physical address of the server/computer?
ah yes, that sounds familiar! Thanks for the reminder. That specific port would be the office/cube unless they are using wireless connection with a laptop.....SO, anyone know someone who works at Heartland or Koch Brothers or Exxon or!?! hahahaha. Kidding, but seriously, gotta get in the weeds if we want to figure this stuff out.....The physical computer will be behind a Firewall so the packets will just have the IP address. Even then the IP will be a NAT'ed IP address and will not be the actual IP of the computer just the IP address for the outside connection of the Firewall. You would actually have to be on the physical network which the sending computer was on to discover the MAC. Even then you could only trace the MAC to a specific port on the network.
The tech is possible with ships, but as you point out, you lose cargo capacity and that's a serious problem. Back in the 50s someone made a nuclear powered freighter as the next new thing. They found that the space needed for the reactor was so much the ship had a tiny payload.
I've heard there already is a short haul ferry in Norway running electric. I think they do a battery swap every time it stops at its home dock and they put the other battery on charge.
In some places making more use of overhead wires for trains might be feasible, but there are a lot of places where there is no infrastructure for wires. A locomotive is going to need massive batteries to go any distance. However, they could put a battery car behind the locomotives. They did essentially do that with steam locomotives. The water and fuel were stored in the tender.
Thanks for posting that. I didn't understand short-selling effects on stock price before, and found the detailed descriptions of false stories illuminating.This thing has been making the upvotes over at the r/teslamotors subreddit. I'm leaving it here in case you don't go there. I hope it comes in handy for some of you someday.
The War on Tesla, Musk, and the Fight for the Future
The electric ferry business is going faster than you think @wdolson
All-electric ferry cuts emission by 95% and costs by 80%, brings in 53 additional orders
The way I understand the charging situation, dockside has a battery that 'trickle' charges pretty much constantly, so it can dump energy fast into the ferry while its tied to the dock.
The ferry goes back and forth, and charges while its at the dock on each end of the run. The solution is sufficiently good compared to the previous approach, that the market is changing over to electric about as fast as new ferries can be built (where have we heard that dynamic before).
And yes - still a very big leap from ferry to Pacific cargo vessel crossings.
The FUD has gone to 11. I was surprised when the forces of FUD infiltrated Bloomberg to run dishonest hit pieces. Now they've inflitrated Vox with a blatantly dishonest piece which I am not even going to link to.
It's worth figuring out who's behind this campaign, because I'm starting to have trouble believing that it's coincidental that the FUD is ramping up so high right now. Some of the authors can probably be tracked back to their money suppliers; this is smelling like corruption.
In an effort to speed up the manufacturing of batteries, an employee told Business Insider that he was asked to feed live babies to Robots. When Business Insider reached out, Tesla declined to comment, but instead pointed out to a statement in the recent investor letter which said, ‘Tesla will achieve its production goals by all means’.
Both links go to an error message now. Apparently they took the article(s) down.This is really bad. I can't support a company that does this. Feeding adult humans is fine, but babies? unbelievable.
http://www.businessinsider.com/tesla-feeding-live-babies-to-robots-2018-5?r=UK&IR=T
Tesla engineers feed live babies to Robots in Gigafactory
Hmmm...those links work fine for me. I am wondering if you are using an Ad blocker ? or it could be behind a pay wall. Generally these kind of highly investigative and high quality reports are behind paywalls. Like every WSJ article.Both links go to an error message now. Apparently they took the article(s) down.
Or maybe they were in your cache already. Definitely 404 for me.Hmmm...those links work fine for me. I am wondering if you are using an Ad blocker ? or it could be behind a pay wall. Generally these kind of highly investigative and high quality reports are behind paywalls. Like every WSJ article.