Me neither.Oh yes please, I am not getting greedy at this point. I would just like my car
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Me neither.Oh yes please, I am not getting greedy at this point. I would just like my car
Congrats , re the rattle , i saw in one video that Aero wheel cover was loose on one of the wheel hence was making noise , check that may be the caseJust picked her up. There was a prominent rattle in the driver door over bumps but it settled right down in the 15 minutes it took to get back to my home office to work. They allow 2 days to report any delivery defects. She came with the mobile connector with two plug tails.
The rattle is coming from the top middle of the door card somewhere.Congrats , re the rattle , i saw in one video that Aero wheel cover was loose on one of the wheel hence was making noise , check that may be the case
A good starting point for Tesla to fix not end users.Might be a good starting point anyway.
Can this new type of battery be charged to 100% all the time as well?LFP:
LMFP:
- Gravimetric energy density > Up to 160 Wh/kg[1] (580 J/g).
In addition, CATL highlighted there's almost NO material cost difference between the two. From their papers, I think even the formula is quite similar to LFP. I'd speculate Tesla will likely replace the entire RWD line with LMFP battery packs, if production volume allows.
- Gravimetric energy density > 230Wh/kg
A good starting point for Tesla to fix not end users.
There hasn't been too much mentioning about this but LMFP has fewer cycles (approx 500 - 1000 cycles) than LFP therefore I think should be charged to no more than 90% only on daily basis.Can this new type of battery be charged to 100% all the time as well?
As an “upgraded version” of LFP, LMFP inherits the advantages of low cost, high thermal stability, and high safety of LFP, and makes up for its shortcomings such as low energy density and poor low temperature stability, but LMFP also has electrical conductivity and rate performance. and poor cycle performance.
If you want to geek out on LFP chemistry vs NCA this is a great video.My understanding is that charging to 100% is still detrimental to LFP, but because of the increased cycle life it's minimal for most users.
But the problem with LFP is that the voltage is fairly constant over the charge curve, so if you only charge say 20-80% then the BMS will quickly become inaccurate. So the recommendation to charge to 100% regularly is in order to keep the BMS calculations correct, at the trade off of some detriment to the battery.
That's disappointing.There hasn't been too much mentioning about this but LMFP has fewer cycles (approx 500 - 1000 cycles) than LFP therefore I think should be charged to no more than 90% only on daily basis.
The cycle performance of the LMFP battery is somewhat similar to the NCA battery. Still respectable and will give you 200,000 to 300,000 km milage.
The battery warranty will cover you for 8 years or 192000 km.That's disappointing.
I was under the impression the nikel and the LFP batteries were both rated for significantly more than that (as in, in the "Outlast the car" territory.) Honestly this significantly changes the value proposition of the car to me. I anticipate buying this vehicle and running it into the ground. I want that to be over well over 10 years, and I anticipate I'll hit 15k KMs per year no problem. (also I have a Y on order thats supposed to be delivered Feb next year, which is why im concerned).
Thanks, @NoTimeToLose, but it’s not my car that has the rattle … I‘ve ordered two, but neither has arrived lolThis thread could be useful, Sparkles:
Location and fix of rattles in new m3p
To start of the post I picked up the model 3 performance on March 30th. Surprising my exterior build quality was phenomenal but my interior had some noticeable rattles all around the car. Going from my BMW 750 that was my daily driver to then my M5 for a couple months while I waited for the M3P...teslamotorsclub.com
In particular: “Inside the door panels we have multiple clips that are loose inside of the housing the rest. My fix was to wrap the connection in electrical tape which made the fit snug.”
"So once you remove the panel off, the clips hold the wires that run all inside the door panel. Throughout the door to hold the connections in place Tesla placed clips that hold the connectors. Those clips maintain the connectors in place but the connectors move due to the amount of play. The fix is to wrap the connectors with electrical tape so when you put it back onto the clip it’s nice and snug and with the electrical tape that removes any contact points. That’s a common issue with how Tesla puts the cars together. It’s not just where the wires go onto clips it’s where the trim snaps into place those clips are loose and cause rattles throughout the car.”
Might be a good starting point anyway.
Sheesh… that was cutting it a bit close!!! But lucky you - locking in at 2.99%PAID, now waiting on the text. 2.99% with 4 days remaining on the 180days.......
500-1000 cycles will give you 200k - 400k KMS in total.That's disappointing.
I was under the impression the nikel and the LFP batteries were both rated for significantly more than that (as in, in the "Outlast the car" territory.) Honestly this significantly changes the value proposition of the car to me. I anticipate buying this vehicle and running it into the ground. I want that to be over well over 10 years, and I anticipate I'll hit 15k KMs per year no problem. (also I have a Y on order thats supposed to be delivered Feb next year, which is why im concerned).
A big amen to that my friend!I'll be happy if I get the car I ordered at the price I signed up for. There will always be a newer/better/shinier bit of technology coming along in six months' time, there’s no point stressing about it.