AlanSubie4Life
Efficiency Obsessed Member
we are going to see wave 2 shortly.
I also referred to it as a second wave a few posts back, so as not to be pedantic. But to be extremely pedantic, we should really refer to this as the continuation of the first wave, focused in states which previously had relatively small outbreaks.
NY and Eastern hotspots don’t seem to be rising so it’s not a universal pattern.
I've heard it hypothesized that in places with major outbreaks, people don't think it's a big hoax, and tend to be much more careful. They also have not really opened up yet, in many cases.
I think another possibility is that the test & trace and public health infrastructure are fully prepared for more cases in the places where things were bad, and are taking it very seriously - that will lead to better control. However, I have concerns about all of these other places (with previous hotspots) as well. I don't get the sense that they have truly eliminated community transmission, and as long as there are other states pooping in the pool, there are going to continue to be floaters. So if the measures are not sufficient to drive R below 1, we're going to see growth in cases and an increase in fear and reduced economic activity.
Definitely hospitalizations are a good thing to track - unfortunately they're often not presented in the most clear way (really each contributor to the daily number - deaths, admissions, discharges - should all be plotted on the same chart)
We need this data, too: