You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
DeSantis: We are not closing down gyms because only healthy and fit individuals are at the gyms, and all the overweight and unhealthy people are in the hospitals.
There is one new case of COVID-19 to report in managed isolation in New Zealand today.
It has been 78 days since the last case of COVID-19 was acquired locally from an unknown source.
Today’s case is a man in his 50s who arrived in New Zealand on July 12 from Central Africa via Tanzania, Doha and Brisbane. He is now in the quarantine facility in Auckland after being transferred yesterday.
The number of active cases in New Zealand is 22.
The total number of confirmed cases of COVID-19 is now 1,200, which is the number we report to the World Health Organization.
There is no one in New Zealand receiving hospital-level care for COVID-19.
Yesterday our laboratories completed 2,403 tests.
The total number of tests completed in New Zealand to date is 441,123.
DeSantis opines that the only 'significant' Covid complication is death. That in itself is idiocy, but he has still not caught on to the notion that infected people infect others. Didn't he close bars ? Seems to me that bars can stay open by the same "reasoning." Just restrict to under a certain age and weight. Although that is not really required. After all, he is one of the 'freedom' people. If a fat, old guy wants to risk Covid to get a beer and hang out with his buddies, who is Santis to say no ?
DeSantis: We are not closing down gyms because only healthy and fit individuals are at the gyms, and all the overweight and unhealthy people are in the hospitals.
Quick report from Sweden. I would estimate that <1% wear masks in public and officials still don’t recommend it. Restaurants with outdoor seating are filling up with beer drinkers and most tables inside with groups also. Still numbers are declining rapidly. Latest government report says R_t=0.58.
Probably it’s a combination of some form of immunity, people avoiding the most superspreader events, immunity among the more social people, low density housing, low density commuting, people being even less social than normally, maybe genetics etc.
Hope the world does not try to copy us, but maybe learn something from us. If you want to escape virus lockdowns, Sweden is a great place to visit right now, go to the gym, get a haircut, drink some beers.
View attachment 565906 View attachment 565907
Ron is tremendous isn't he? There was a reason I gave him one of the very 1st Moron Awards. He's right there with the Orange Moron. He's just doing a terrific job!
Quick report from Sweden. I would estimate that <1% wear masks in public and officials still don’t recommend it. Restaurants with outdoor seating are filling up with beer drinkers and most tables inside with groups also. Still numbers are declining rapidly. Latest government report says R_t=0.58.
Probably it’s a combination of some form of immunity, people avoiding the most superspreader events, immunity among the more social people, low density housing, low density commuting, people being even less social than normally, maybe genetics etc.
Hope the world does not try to copy us, but maybe learn something from us. If you want to escape virus lockdowns, Sweden is a great place to visit right now, go to the gym, get a haircut, drink some beers.
View attachment 565906 View attachment 565907
Or, phrased another way:I guess he doesn’t think healthy asymptomatic individuals can spread the virus.
I guess he doesn’t think
He's got a plot of CFR over time but I can't tell if his model is using a changing CFR over time?View attachment 566010 This model (which is based on a gamma distribution of onset to death, weighted by probability, based on past deaths and actual case line data, so should be quite good - see prior posts) really is tracking quite well.
Seems like we should just do this nationwide and then we would have a highly predictive model with a 2-3 week lead time. Still not fast enough to take actions to save lots of lives, but at least it is better than waiting for deaths to show up!
Basically if you have the individual case data (age, onset date, etc.) for every positive test, you can predict very well what will be future mortality based on past results.
https://twitter.com/zorinaq/status/1284539070203355136?s=21
mbevand/florida-covid19-line-list-data
Or, we can just listen to EthicalSkeptic, RebelACole, Justin Hart, Hold2LLC and the rest of the bizarre gas-lighting echo chamber on Twitter, and insist deaths are not increasing.
They should do a standardized survey with each test and calculate the probability of tests coming back positive relative to the survey question answers. I would not even bother wasting tests on people who have pneumonia and loss of taste or smell, just mix all their mucus together and tell them they're all positive. That would be a good way to eliminate false negatives!FDA approves pooled coronavirus testing in hopes of boosting testing capacity
"Quest Diagnostics will now be able to group up to four samples together and will only test them individually if the batch comes back positive. This approach — which has been used in Germany, China, Israel, and South Africa, among other countries — can help save valuable time and resources during the pandemic."
"Politico notes, however, that this strategy applies to places where prevalence of the virus is low, and the chances of having a batch where nothing is detected are higher. Places experiencing more severe outbreaks, on the other hand, are still better off with individual testing."
Are they naked raking the forest floor of all those combustible leaves?It's July. Swedes are now on like a 6 week vacation, frolicking naked in thr forest by their cottages or whatnot.
The big cities are likely empty.
I was thinking about the prevalence threshold when this idea first circulated. If the batch of 4 is positive then 5 tests are performed instead of 4; and if the batch is negative then 1 test was performed instead of 4. If test positivity likelihood is p percent then the likelihood of a batch of 4 negatives is (1-p)^4 = PFDA approves pooled coronavirus testing in hopes of boosting testing capacity
"Quest Diagnostics will now be able to group up to four samples together and will only test them individually if the batch comes back positive. This approach — which has been used in Germany, China, Israel, and South Africa, among other countries — can help save valuable time and resources during the pandemic."
"Politico notes, however, that this strategy applies to places where prevalence of the virus is low, and the chances of having a batch where nothing is detected are higher. Places experiencing more severe outbreaks, on the other hand, are still better off with individual testing."