So I'm 100% wrong? This is not a capitalist country? This is not a supply and demand problem? Had we not had a band of morons running this country in 2020 we'd have had a national stockpile of things like masks and tests. I don't know about other countries, but Germany has been pretty much on top of this and able to handle testing from the beginning. And they don't allow cloth "masks". Only medical grade. And people have no problem finding them. Had the Biden (really the Trump) administration offered to fund expansion rather than just relying on the free market entirely, we'd be in a much better situation now. There are things that government can get done better, albeit with well paid off corporations. This is very demonstrably one of them.
Yeah, on this point, you are flat out wrong. And don't try to split hairs and pick some rice grain of truth in a tangential argument to support your overall argument that "capitalism is bad for medicine" You attributed a shortage of something during an unprecedented demand, so that you can then make a push for a socialist agenda, and are thereby making this political and completely ignoring the facts.
FACT: as Elon said, "manufacturing is hard". Manufacturing at scale is exponentially harder, especially something like a biological test.
I also call out your "tests" scenario with Germany that you used to support your argument for testing:
Live statistics and coronavirus news tracking the number of confirmed cases, recovered patients, tests, and death toll due to the COVID-19 coronavirus from Wuhan, China. Coronavirus counter with new cases, deaths, and number of tests per 1 Million population. Historical data and info. Daily...
www.worldometers.info
Per the facts, the US has tested every person in the country nearly 3X since the pandemic began. Germany . . . 1X.
US Population: 333,924,197
US Total Tests: 817,687,497
Germ Population: 84,187,242
Germ Total Tests: 89,622,218
FACT - per capita, the USA has tested it's population 2.5X what Germany has. FACT.
EDIT - a BETTER correlation - the countries that have tested the most per capita (assuming a LARGE population, not something like 30mil or less), the USA, UK, France, and Italy all have LARGE PRESENCES by pharma manufacturers. The more appropriate conclusion is that test availability is more determined by ability to obtain locally-manufactured testing kits.
EDIT2 - and on those tests, we have zero breakdown of which ones are:
1) antigen
2) PCR
3) multiplex PCR
Multiplex PCR can give you 100, or 1000, or 10,000 "negatives" if everyone in a single test tube is negative. So the the real variable you want to know is "unique tests completed", and we don't have that data, because in theory, I could toss 100,000 PCR samples into a single test tube, spin it down for the DNA, and then run a single multiplex PCR on it and call that 100,000 negatives. But I didn't actually run 100,000 tests, I just relied upon statical power (and a bit of luck having no positives in that tube) to get me all those negatives.