I'm just saying that any claim of it making sense to give owners priority because they'll be lower maintenance people or better cheerleaders is bad logic
I tried to convince myself to, truly. I took the time to do 4 separate test drives, one of which was three days long. I ran the numbers, I decided the math was easy and I could afford a new Model S. The problem is that I couldn't convince myself it was a good value when compared to a 3, and everything used with autopilot was an even worse value if I just wanted to buy my way into the priority queue and sell it as soon as I got the car I actually want. Honestly I'd rather just pay an extra couple thousand bucks and straight up pay for an earlier delivery.
Which makes you more informed that the
average consumer and not fitting in the
theoretical case I was speaking of (large numbers, not single individuals).
Just an extra 15 minutes at orientation would cut delivery rate 33% (assuming base cycle time of 30 minutes).
On average:
Current owners have a particular skill set that is very useful toward not needing support:
Charging (home and away)
Cold weather/ rain /snow impact
Aluminum body panel care
Autopilot (varies over model year)
Creep
Regen
OTA updates
Ranger/ SvC
Maybe the should they have had a 1 year/ 200 post TMC category also... (I am not an owner currently or previously).
@AustinPowers
It helps due to less effort needed to support the first group of vehicles, especially as SvC are ramping up. Just as starting in California makes things faster and easier.
It helps if the 3 will be used, ICE miles replaced are good regardless of family car count. I do agree if getting a 3 makes an S not driven, that is not helpful. However, it could also be the case that the older Tesla becomes a CPO for someone else.
I understand the annoyance and waiting longer, but once Tesla hits 1k cars per week, the line jumping of a new owner delays things by 10 minutes. If all new owners continually reserve a 3, that would be a problem.