using the smear hitler has replaced racist as the preferred smear of the intellectually inept in their ill informed child like temper tantrums., but the comparison of Trump and Hitler is just too rich.
Godwin's law - Wikipedia
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
using the smear hitler has replaced racist as the preferred smear of the intellectually inept in their ill informed child like temper tantrums., but the comparison of Trump and Hitler is just too rich.
apparently in your personal situation your skills and your value to the company was the reason for your continuation, in the case of state, these people were apparently not what the current leaders wanted in those positions.Actually, yes I do know of companies (some Fortune 500, one Fortune 100) where management is not asked to leave with a change. In fact, I've personally twice benefited from being given a 'stay bonus' to NOT leave because a new CEO was coming in.
More typically, I've watched a new CEO come in and wait at least a few months to evaluate their direct team before making changes. Usually they'll bring one trusted person along (and some face plant stories along those lines). But the majority of the team has stayed intact, most likely because of the harm that would result with just getting rid of all the top people. A good CEO would understand these people got in their positions through knowledge (typically), very likely have team loyalty, and understand nuances that might not be obvious to a new person, no matter how good their qualifications might be.
I'd feel much better if the people coming in had resumes to support their new position. But with a few exceptions, they do not.
Modern medicine could help, I'm sure.
The Grabber in Chief doesn't believe in modern medicine. He believes in witchcraft!
He is an anti-vaxxer,
No, it is not. The difference is in the winner-take-all system state-by-state. If candidate A wins a state by 80% to 20%, or wins it by 51% to 49%, or even wins it by 34% to 33% to 33% in a three-way race, the result is the same: All the state's electors go to candidate A. The effect is the dilution of the majority votes in states with a large majority for one candidate and the magnification of the majority votes in states with close races. In a democratic system the majority rules. In our system, the majority is often completely excluded from power and the minority rules.
Something similar happens due to gerrymandering at the state level in the election of representatives to the House: Voters of one party are systematically concentrated into a few districts, and voters of the other party are strategically placed in districts where they will win by small majorities, and the result is that the party with fewer votes gets more of the representatives.
Gerrymandering and the Electoral College subvert democracy, systematically giving power to the minority party. This is the opposite of democracy.
...
Original democracy was worse: Only free men could vote. Slaves and women could not.
jkn said:Original democracy was worse: Only free men could vote. Slaves and women could not.
Just wait a while. Soon, the US will be back to that again. I mean it has started already. Trumps Anti-Muslim act is just the beginning. It plays into the cards of the IS while at the same time destroying all the positive values the US used to stand for as moral leader of the free world. If I were France, I would ask for my Statue of Liberty back.
Perhaps many in the US haven't noticed yet, but in only two weeks in office, Trump has managed to alienate almost the whole world, especially many former allies and partners.
one reason the media missed it is because of the echo chamber that they exist in, for the most part they are biased to the left.This is exactly why Brexit and Trump surprised people so much. The perception from the media and social media bubbles was not accurate representation of the world.
Trump is taking an ancient political tactic -- berating and demonizing his opponents in order to solidify support among those who agree with him -- to a new level, at least for American politics.I swear the Trump administration is TRYING to divide us. I don't understand why. But it would seem to be their intent. If you want to resist, keep talking, and try to be respectful. One of Trump's biggest failings (or strategy?) is being disrespectful, and we should try hard not to join him in that. He doesn't want us trying to get along.
Trump is taking an ancient political tactic -- berating and demonizing his opponents in order to solidify support among those who agree with him -- to a new level, at least for American politics.
I don't respect him because he hasn't earned an iota of my respect. So I can't "get along" with him or in fact anyone who supports him. I can only resist his abhorrent policies and speak out.
It is my understanding that many of the outraged countries - and many of the affected countries - do not allow Israeli citizens to enter at all. As a permanent policy.
Trump is taking an ancient political tactic -- berating and demonizing his opponents in order to solidify support among those who agree with him -- to a new level, at least for American politics.
I don't respect him because he hasn't earned an iota of my respect. So I can't "get along" with him or in fact anyone who supports him. I can only resist his abhorrent policies and speak out. He will fail to change America and will quickly come to be known as the worst president in American history. He will pass. But it is going to be painful...
Another perhaps surprisingly US/nationalistic post from Elon. He seems to be going all #MAGA on this.
Hmm, I wonder why that might be. I thought Israel was loved in the Arab world...
</sarcasm>
Just saying the world is quite a bit more complex than the black and white debate of the past few days seems to suggest.
Of course it is. Problem is, Trump is trying to paint exactly that black and white image all the time.
He is not known (yet) for nuanced thinking or communicating. A true president needs more than just stereotypes in his head, plus he needs a way of communicating eloquently. Trump as yet shows no signs of that, nor has he during his campain. Or did you get a different image of him, even recently?