I’ve posted about this before. Put not being there (I did not go back and reread my prior post where I responded to your post where I detail it) [EDIT: the word
put IS there, of course, in another section, so I will add a disagree] does not change my point, of course. It is a statement of the state of the vehicle, clearly.
That’s why they wrote it that way!!!
See my post above, there are two sections, the second one includes “put” (my memory did not fail me!), but it does not matter. It’s all the same gymnastics.
Just English language details. Annoying but correct. There’s just no way to read those statements as a statement about the
driver using FSD correctly, because that’s not what they say. It does not talk about the driver’s use of FSD! The subject is the vehicle in the portion you quoted.
FSD fails to detect children in the road