chiller
Member
Norway is pretty much closed in July.
The Big July Shutdown
Norwegians Abandon Their Posts for Fellesferie
The Big July Shutdown
Norwegians Abandon Their Posts for Fellesferie
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I’m not denying that Tesla (whether S, 3, or X) is a much better car, and will sell far more. But there are lots of people who are intrigued by EVs, and some of them are biased against innovative startups, or only buy European cars (even though Jaguar is actually an Indian company), or love knobs & buttons, or fear touchscreens, etc. They can buy the I-Pace and have a great EV.
And then, by the next time they buy a car, hopefully they realize that Teslas are, in fact, much better.
im very surprised no one on here is talking about this FUD suppliers article from WSJ that does not release the whole memo lol
What kind of passive fund would already own TSLA? That would be funds that track other indexes where Tesla is already part of, wouldn’t that be small compared to S&P500 tracking funds?
But in the stock market wise money thinks were the puck is going so probably many are already calculating Tesla’s additioning to S&P and are now buying it because of it. If there would not be funds forerunning additioning and removing companies from indexes, it would be really easy to make money with this.
So it's exactly what all the people with manufacturing experience said it was, and the WSJ article was hit-piece disinformation.Statement from Tesla
Stop with all the logic!Statement from Tesla
Statement from Tesla
yes. not only that, there’s an abundance of searchable material regarding supp chain negotiation - i posted a decent one form HBR on the WSJ thread, but given it’s importance i’ll post here as wellSo it's exactly what all the people with manufacturing experience said it was, and the WSJ article was hit-piece disinformation.
Sigh.
So it's exactly what all the people with manufacturing experience said it was, and the WSJ article was hit-piece disinformation.
Sigh.
Many years ago, my thought processes evolved to where the first thing I do upon reading or hearing something from the media is to try to figure out how something could be getting twisted to say something 180 degrees off of the real truth. And more specifically, how they could do that without actually saying something that but they couldn't weasel their way out of later (i.e., politician speak). Nowadays, they don't even seem to bother with plausible deniability.I've learned to always assume it's a hit piece twisting of the facts garbage until soundly proven otherwise.
Just? Guardian has been on the FUD train for months. They were the ones that broke the "stories" about the factory injuries and the farting unicorn. They have been a pretty steadfast enemy of Tesla for sometime now.