Welcome to Tesla Motors Club
Discuss Tesla's Model S, Model 3, Model X, Model Y, Cybertruck, Roadster and More.
Register
This site may earn commission on affiliate links.
I heard a sound bite this morning that he was already backing off of the "Chinese climate change hoax" statement.

Correct. He had a face to face with the New York Times yesterday, which a full transcript is available for. He backed up considerably, which is what myself and many fully expected him to do.

With Trump, you just have to remember he's a businessman. It has to "make sense", and he will consider it.
 
Correct. He had a face to face with the New York Times yesterday, which a full transcript is available for. He backed up considerably, which is what myself and many fully expected him to do.

With Trump, you just have to remember he's a businessman. It has to "make sense", and he will consider it.
Not so quick. This morning we have this:
Trump to scrap Nasa climate research in crackdown on ‘politicized science’

Nasa’s Earth science division is set to be stripped of funding as the president-elect seeks to shift focus away from home in favor of deep space exploration
 
That decision probably needs to be looked at again. Let's hope at least some of the funding is maintained.
The problem is that Trump is a psychopathic liar which means that he will say whatever people want to hear and he feels no remorse about reversing himself (and will deny that he ever changed his statements... he doesn't think he lies).
Here is a good analysis by Joe Romm:
Trump fools the New York Times on climate change

Memo to media: Ignore what Trump says, focus on what he does and who he appoints.
Why does the Times say Trump has an “open mind” on climate? Because Trump said he has an “open mind” on climate. In fact, he said it six times in the span of a few minutes.
Pay no attention to the hardcore climate denier that Trump named his chief White House strategist, the hardcore climate denier Trump put in charge of the EPA transition (and who is on the shortlist to run the EPA), the climate action opponent Trump named as his Chief of Staff, the fossil fuel executives and lobbyists overseeing his transition for the departments of Energy and Interior, and the conservative Supreme Court judge he can name who would be the fifth vote to block the EPA’s modest domestic climate plan.
 
The problem is that Trump is a psychopathic liar which means that he will say whatever people want to hear and he feels no remorse about reversing himself (and will deny that he ever changed his statements... he doesn't think he lies).
Here is a good analysis by Joe Romm:
Trump fools the New York Times on climate change

Memo to media: Ignore what Trump says, focus on what he does and who he appoints.
Why does the Times say Trump has an “open mind” on climate? Because Trump said he has an “open mind” on climate. In fact, he said it six times in the span of a few minutes.
Pay no attention to the hardcore climate denier that Trump named his chief White House strategist, the hardcore climate denier Trump put in charge of the EPA transition (and who is on the shortlist to run the EPA), the climate action opponent Trump named as his Chief of Staff, the fossil fuel executives and lobbyists overseeing his transition for the departments of Energy and Interior, and the conservative Supreme Court judge he can name who would be the fifth vote to block the EPA’s modest domestic climate plan.
Exactly. Exactly. Exactly
 
  • Like
Reactions: CTShore
I actually think the two CEOs would have a great conversation. Tesla is a good news story for American jobs. Trump needs to grab that and further enable Teslas ability to a broader market. Think of it as an EV in every driveway type campaign to avoid foreign oil.

I agree. Actions not words are what count. All politicians are liars. Some are just better at it than others.
 
Not so quick. This morning we have this:
Trump to scrap Nasa climate research in crackdown on ‘politicized science’

Nasa’s Earth science division is set to be stripped of funding as the president-elect seeks to shift focus away from home in favor of deep space exploration

Propaganda piece by the left. There is absolutely no quote there from Trump to actually support the meat and potatoes of their argument.

Isn't this kind of journalism what the NYT just fell on their sword about for the past two weeks?


No one can make the conclusions in this article until a BUDGET PROPOSAL is put forward or an official statement made. Neither of which exist to support the conclusions of this article.


Liberal FUDmongering.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Xenoilphobe
Trump climate change adviser provides CBC with dubious sources

On Wednesday, CBC Radio's Carol Off interviewed Donald Trump's climate change adviser, Robert Walker, former chair of the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Science, Space and Technology, and she seems to have got under his skin.

Walker disputes the assertion that the vast majority of climate scientists believe the evidence of human-caused global warming.

Off quoted Walker as having said that only about half of scientists actually agree with climate change.

He responded that he was talking only about climatologists, not all scientists. If you take the climatologist group, alone, without other disciplines, including social sciences, Walker said, you will see that there is significant dissent from the so-called consensus.

However, when asked to provide a source for that assertion, the Trump adviser could not, and made a vague reference to something he had read, somewhere.

After the interview, Walker sent Carol Off's program, As It Happens, an e-mail, in which he cited three sources: an organization called Open Source Systems, Science and Solutions; another called the National Association of Scholars; and something he called the Center for Climate Research.

To start with the last group, Walker said it had showed that of 4,000 research abstracts on global warming only one per cent attributed it exclusively to human causes.

The Center Walker cited may exist. If so, it does not seem to have any online presence.

<snip>

As for the entity known as Open Source Systems, Science and Solutions, its published material vigorously supports the scientific consensus on climate change. It does not in any way whatsoever endorse the assertions Walker made in the As It Happens interview and in his subsequent e-mail.

In the section of Open Source's web site dedicated to myths versus facts on global warming it says:

"This news and analysis section addresses substance of arguments such as 'global warming is a hoax,' 'global warming is a fiction,' 'global warming is created to make money for Al Gore.' The main fallacy noted is that most arguments are facts out of context while others are simply false representations. When the facts pertaining to the arguments are viewed in context relevance becomes obvious. The data clearly indicates global warming is happening and is human caused."

One has to assume that in providing CBC with these sources the U.S. politician and senior Trump adviser assumed nobody would check them.

He was wrong.

Full article at:
Trump climate change advisor provides CBC with dubious sources
 
  • Like
Reactions: bkp_duke