perhaps also reporting on FTD and short interest more than 2x per month.I have no problem with shorting per se. If somebody is taking a short position legally - borrow shares first and then sell them, totally fine. And then carry through with something more like we call buy and hold - for short sales it'd be sell and hold. The idea in both cases is an investment thesis that we then sit back and watch, instead of using manipulative buys and sales; series of heavily biased articles designed to push the stock price in our direction.
It's the latter two bits that are the problem. Specifically including naked shorting by 'investors' that are taking a directional bet, and using naked shorts to manufacture counterfeit shares, pushing the actual share price down the supply / demand curve. These are the problem.
I think there are a couple of facets to the solution. The easy one is re-implement the uptick rule for all companies, all of the time. Companies that want to short will still short - they just won't be able to use the manipulative naked shorts to drive the share price down. Or at least not as much.
The second, which is harder to explain to the general public, is for some serious regulatory hand slapping for FTDs and for naked shorting for the purpose of taking a direction. I think this is solvable by shrinking the time window for short sale shares to be located and borrowed. Better is to make access to naked shorting much more difficult - restrict it to actual market makers with a non-directional position and give them 3 day settlement to find and borrow shares. Real market makers with a non-directional position will either buy to close those shares quickly, or will go seeking borrowed shares.
In reality they won't want to pay the interest, so they'll buy-to-close their naked shorts swiftly.
what’s the FTD and short interest since 1/14?
S3’s guess is the best anyone can get on short int. and it seems to get revised.
they have almost 5 weeks to hide things.