Analysis from my car
107,701 sticker
-7,500 Federal Credit
-17,500 $1/mile (my normal depreciation number owning similar cars for three year stints)
Yield on a normal trade in for me would be
83,210
-15,000 Tesla's $1/mile
68,210
It looks like Tesla is using their $1/mile and $1K/month formula for my car once the Federal Tax Credit is deducted.
I am considering listing my car for $83K retail. I will not net the 6% Florida Sales Tax credit I would normally get on a trade but this may be the price I pay for upgrading before year three.
[...]
blox Boston
March delivery 2014 P85 with 8,000 miles, paid/list $112,700. Quote is for $80,000. So 7 months, 8k miles, $32,700 loss.
They compute this as the paid price minus the federal and state tax rebates/credits, times 76%.
Hi, @lolachampcar,
At the risk of revisiting well-trodden ground, there are things I still don't understand about this approach to valuing the vehicle.
1. You subtract $17,500 for $1/mile depreciation, per your previous experiences with reselling vehicles. Then you subtract *another* $15,000 for Tesla's $1/mile depreciation. That looks like double-counting your mileage for depreciation purposes. How are these two things different?
2. You do *not* subtract Tesla's $1k/month for valuation purposes. Why not? (I confess that I wouldn't, but more on that in a moment.)
3. Why does everyone assume that the Federal tax credit should be deducted from the price of the car as part of the deriving the resale price?! If I'm buying a used car, I go back to look at the original MSRP, options, etc., via all the online valuation services. I almost never have access to the actual price paid by the original owner.
In the current algorithm, it seems as if the Federal tax credit benefit is being passed through more or less directly to the next buyer! The original owner is effectively penalized. Why?! Does this mean that if I buy a Massachusetts after-June-2014 Tesla in a private sale, I should expect the owner to also deduct $2500 from the price because s/he will receive the new MA EV tax credit? For that matter, it's not completely out of the question for an individual to have carry forward losses or similar that would wipe out Federal taxes for that year, and so the individual might not benefit from that $7500 credit.
The original owner took the risk of buying an EV, hence was rewarded with an incentive. The next owner in the chain is buying a used vehicle, taking the risks associated with that along with the benefits -- a vast price reduction. I just don't see the case for passing the tax credits along in a private sale, nor do I see the case for Tesla using that information in their algorithm.
4. If we're trying to build a reasonable way to value resales that isn't strictly dependent on, "I found a sucker to buy my car, so now that's what the market will bear", then I think that certain aftermarket additions should be taken into account, just like the overall vehicle condition. The primary ones I believe I can justify are:
+ paint protection film (wow, have I seen the benefit for myself)
+ window and sunroof tinting (see many threads on the benefits, especially in the third row)
As much as I enjoy my OptiCoat, lighted door sills, and whatnot, I have no idea how to value them on resale and probably wouldn't even try.
5. Last, although Tesla has built this $1/mile + $1k/month depreciation model, I think the $1k/month component doesn't scale. Cars don't depreciate linearly. After some number of months, I think the $1k/month component is no longer valid.
As for the $1/mile component, while I can wrap my head around the concept of taking mileage into account as a major indicator of wear and tear and hence depreciation, I don't understand how we've arrived at that particular value. Much smaller numbers are used for corporate reimbursements, taxes, etc. So why should we buy into $1/mile?
Thanks!
Alan