I refrained from entering the side banter but man at some point someone needs to say it out loud and I am that kind of guy.OMG great minds think alike lol. This will blow over soon enough.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I refrained from entering the side banter but man at some point someone needs to say it out loud and I am that kind of guy.OMG great minds think alike lol. This will blow over soon enough.
I'm actually kinda scared to post stuff about the Model S right now lol.I refrained from entering the side banter but man at some point someone needs to say it out loud and I am that kind of guy.
The funny thing is that @TSLA Pilot Pilot’s message may or may not be right, but no one will listen to his stupidity and arrogance. It’s like he makes me want to drive a diesel truck with his approach.I refrained from entering the side banter but man at some point someone needs to say it out loud and I am that kind of guy.
Cold weather improvements?Just not a notification for a SW update--not sure what is in it, but maybe good news for folks on a SW hold.
Patch Note will be ready in two weeksCold weather improvements?
That dude was brilliant. Saw him right before he passed. So glad I did.Watch "George Carlin - Saving the Planet" on YouTube
You nailed it bro. He even busted out the logical fallacy piece just a bit ago. I laughed looking at that. Using a logical fallacy argument as a logical fallacy. Missing the point entirely that we are all guilty and sanctimony is neither effective nor justified. (which has nothing to do with the whole global warming discussion)The funny thing is that @TSLA Pilot Pilot’s message may or may not be right, but no one will listen to his stupidity and arrogance. It’s like he makes me want to drive a diesel truck with his approach.
Oh, and I got solar in 2009, so take that you sky polluter @TSLA Pilot!
Nice one bro. Does this really address what you are being called out for? Read the responses.Your logical fallacy is tu quoque
You avoided having to engage with criticism by turning it back on the accuser - you answered criticism with criticism.yourlogicalfallacyis.com
tu quoque
You avoided having to engage with criticism by turning it back on the accuser - you answered criticism with criticism.
Pronounced too-kwo-kweh. Literally translating as 'you too' this fallacy is also known as the appeal to hypocrisy. It is commonly employed as an effective red herring because it takes the heat off someone having to defend their argument, and instead shifts the focus back on to the person making the criticism.
Example: Nicole identified that Hannah had committed a logical fallacy, but instead of addressing the substance of her claim, Hannah accused Nicole of committing a fallacy earlier on in the conversation.
Or perhaps:
Your logical fallacy is no true scotsman
You made what could be called an appeal to purity as a way to dismiss relevant criticisms or flaws of your argument.yourlogicalfallacyis.com
no true scotsman
You made what could be called an appeal to purity as a way to dismiss relevant criticisms or flaws of your argument.
In this form of faulty reasoning one's belief is rendered unfalsifiable because no matter how compelling the evidence is, one simply shifts the goalposts so that it wouldn't apply to a supposedly 'true' example. This kind of post-rationalization is a way of avoiding valid criticisms of one's argument.
Example: Angus declares that Scotsmen do not put sugar on their porridge, to which Lachlan points out that he is a Scotsman and puts sugar on his porridge. Furious, like a true Scot, Angus yells that no true Scotsman sugars his porridge.
My car should be here shortly and I will be test fitting the 20x9 TSWs off my P90D. I'll likely go to 265s or 275s all the way around to keep the ability to rotate and have my spare usable on all four corners. Atlanta is not that far if you want to come down and take a look.Okay, so I am ordering some aftermarket 20” wheels in anticipation of getting the car sometime before I lose my mind!
question - the 20s will allow both the 255front / 285rear AND the 265front / 295rear config.
assuming I’m losing around 10lbs weight per corner, how much real range do I lose with the wider ones?
and do not forget handlingAerodynamics of the wheels have a bigger impact on range than weight. The biggest benefit to wheel weight reduction will be on acceleration.
If the poster was a pilot, the odds are way in the favor of not believing in climate change. My guess is piloting a Tesla.I'm curious to what your occupation is. Are you a pilot as your name suggests?
Ok, I am really old enough to know better than to step into this as its going to take a while to clean off my shoes but here we go.Your logical fallacy is tu quoque
You avoided having to engage with criticism by turning it back on the accuser - you answered criticism with criticism.yourlogicalfallacyis.com
tu quoque
You avoided having to engage with criticism by turning it back on the accuser - you answered criticism with criticism.
Pronounced too-kwo-kweh. Literally translating as 'you too' this fallacy is also known as the appeal to hypocrisy. It is commonly employed as an effective red herring because it takes the heat off someone having to defend their argument, and instead shifts the focus back on to the person making the criticism.
Example: Nicole identified that Hannah had committed a logical fallacy, but instead of addressing the substance of her claim, Hannah accused Nicole of committing a fallacy earlier on in the conversation.
Or perhaps:
Your logical fallacy is no true scotsman
You made what could be called an appeal to purity as a way to dismiss relevant criticisms or flaws of your argument.yourlogicalfallacyis.com
no true scotsman
You made what could be called an appeal to purity as a way to dismiss relevant criticisms or flaws of your argument.
In this form of faulty reasoning one's belief is rendered unfalsifiable because no matter how compelling the evidence is, one simply shifts the goalposts so that it wouldn't apply to a supposedly 'true' example. This kind of post-rationalization is a way of avoiding valid criticisms of one's argument.
Example: Angus declares that Scotsmen do not put sugar on their porridge, to which Lachlan points out that he is a Scotsman and puts sugar on his porridge. Furious, like a true Scot, Angus yells that no true Scotsman sugars his porridge.
I totally forgot about that spare! I’ve lugged around a fully functional wheel on my current one on long trips. Going stagerred means I’ll be at the mercy of luck.My car should be here shortly and I will be test fitting the 20x9 TSWs off my P90D. I'll likely go to 265s or 275s all the way around to keep the ability to rotate and have my spare usable on all four corners. Atlanta is not that far if you want to come down and take a look.
As for range, no clue.
So better acceleration than regular Plaid! Iiinteresting! Might just become Plaid+and do not forget handling
Jesus.VIN!!!!!!