Following him on twitter doesnt make me Realist, period.
LOL. :biggrin:
Only Realist = Realist
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Following him on twitter doesnt make me Realist, period.
LOL. :biggrin:
Only Realist = Realist
We should be fair as far as excess inventory goes in China Elon himself commented they have excess inventory to work through there.
Tesla boss Elon Musk t give up China market | South China Morning Post
"China is the only place on earth where we have excess inventory. We are essentially selling cars that speculators ordered but we were unable to deliver,"
I'm pretty sure that is a legitimate quote from his last visit. Now they may be selling plenty of P85Ds for all we know but having a hard time finding buyers for P85s. In that case all the inventory will be left over from last year and it may be more useful for Tesla to use it for warehouse lines of credit than trying to sell it too quickly.
LOL. :biggrin:
Only Realist = Realist
This bear attack isn't strong enough. I'd like some more TSLA cheap, please.
Here is a truly silly rumor:
From Briefing.com:
11:27 TSLA Tesla Motors ticks lower following rumors of Apple (AAPL) taking a stake in Fiat Chrysler (FCAU) (246.53 -2.31)
Let's see, Chrysler is the least competitive US car maker; Fiat has backward-looking management (recall CEO Marchionne actually discouraging purchase of its Fiat 500 EV in the US), both are union and pension liability laden. A total culture clash with Apple. I'd like to see the source of these "rumors", as I'll bet they're zero credibility.
Tesla (NASDAQ: TSLA) and Fiat Chrysler Automobiles (NYSE: FCAU) shares were in focus following Carl Icahn's open letter to Apple (Nasdaq: AAPL).
"At $1.6 trillion, the enormous addressable market for new cars is approximately four times the size of the smartphone market. It’s estimated that people spend an average of 1 hour every day traveling, mostly in cars, but not everyone drives, implying that the average time that daily commuters spend in a car is much higher. We believe the rumors that Apple will introduce an Apple-branded car by 2020, and we believe it is no coincidence that many believe visibility on autonomous driving will gain material traction by then," said Icahn.
The hedge fund manager added, "The rising cost of oil, its impact on global warming, the geopolitical risks associated with oil dependency (especially as fuel for automobiles), followed more recently by the rise of cost effective alternatives presents a “change the world” opportunity for Apple. It is widely believed that the electric battery will play a key role in this transition. The lithium-ion battery already represents a critical component across many of Apple’s existing products (iPhone, iPad, Apple Watch, MacBook, Beats) and any further innovation could be a “game changer” in terms of both battery life and form factor across Apple’s entire ecosystem. Since lithium-ion batteries represent a large percentage of the cost of today’s electric vehicle, we believe Apple should be well positioned to leverage its existing knowledge domain and more robust R&D spending in this area, and in turn apply any energy density / battery life improvements for a car across all the other products in its ecosystem that will share the benefit from such battery innovation (iPhone, iPad, Apple Watch, MacBook, Beats)."
Had a great time with Germans. It will be a true test of my crystall ball to see if it wirks. To $260!!!
Our German friends are very good at food, beer, hospitality and powering up magic fortune-telling equipment. So I hear.
Interesting that the Barclay report quotes a "$230" share price. It hasn't been 230 since May 6 - day of the earnings report over a week ago. I wonder when the report was originally released.
Tesla: Battery Opportunity Will Investors Still See $190 in Autos? - Stocks to Watch - Barrons.com
Based on the projections for residential solar penetration from our Utilities colleague Dan Ford, we see even in an optimistic case (that is, solar 3x our colleagues’ base case and a sizeable niche for luxury off-grid houses), US residential using up less than 1GWh of the 15GWh gigafactory output earmarked for stationary storage – leading to a big hole to fill from residential arbitrage markets, non-US residential markets and utility-scale grid storage applications…
So Dan is calculating 3X (our colleagues'?) residential bast case model and no Powerpack commercial sales?
Bears, stop defending $250. It is not technically significant enough to defend. Regroup at $260 and we'll have a glorious battle.