Welcome to Tesla Motors Club
Discuss Tesla's Model S, Model 3, Model X, Model Y, Cybertruck, Roadster and More.
Register

Stolen Model S crashes after police pursuit. 7/4/14

This site may earn commission on affiliate links.
At the scene. The rear end embedded in the building must be seen to be believed. Will upload 35mm telephoto pics in a few days

vy2u8yma.jpg


y6ady5eq.jpg


ysyra5aq.jpg
 
IIRC even Elon has admitted that the "zero fatalities/permanent injuries" statistic isn't going to last forever.

If it's got to end, a thief not wearing a seatbelt is about the least PR-damaging way it can be done. Hopefully all police and innocent bystanders are OK.
 
I'm reasonably certain that Tesla has the ability to track and shut down any Model S as long as it has a data connection, loaner or not, mobile access enabled or not. I believe they can even change the settings remotely (as hinted by my DS), which should include the speed limiter.

I expect you are correct. When I received my Tesla it would only go 80MPH (not that I would ever speed in my car). I called Tesla and they fixed it remotely while the car was on. I'm sure they have the ability to shut it down.

The odd part is if this is possible and Tesla was the one who reported the original tampering, why didn't they shut it down during the pursuit? it will be interesting to get all of the blanks filled in on this accident.
 
I expect you are correct. When I received my Tesla it would only go 80MPH (not that I would ever speed in my car). I called Tesla and they fixed it remotely while the car was on. I'm sure they have the ability to shut it down.

The odd part is if this is possible and Tesla was the one who reported the original tampering, why didn't they shut it down during the pursuit? it will be interesting to get all of the blanks filled in on this accident.

Probably because it's dangerous to shutdown a car while it's moving. Exhibit A: People killed in GM cars with faulty ignition switches that shutdown the car.
 
Probably because it's dangerous to shutdown a car while it's moving. Exhibit A: People killed in GM cars with faulty ignition switches that shutdown the car.

Perhaps, but this is a feature of OnStar. The difference with the faulty ignition is that Onstar leaves the airbags on and slows (cuts acceleration only) the car in a controlled fashion. I'm sure Tesla would be able to reduce the power or stop the car in a safe manner. It's a hell of a lot better than some idiot hitting other cars and a building at 100MPH.
 
Perhaps, but this is a feature of OnStar. The difference with the faulty ignition is that Onstar leaves the airbags on and slows (cuts acceleration only) the car in a controlled fashion. I'm sure Tesla would be able to reduce the power or stop the car in a safe manner. It's a hell of a lot better than some idiot hitting other cars and a building at 100MPH.

Shutting down cars remotely while it's moving is a huge risk to the surrounding community, the driver, and Tesla since they don't see what the driver sees. They need to have some sort of police "escort" or supervision before they remotely shutdown a stolen moving car. We don't know what kind of contact Tesla had with the police during the pursuit and we're also not sure what kind of "disable" capability Tesla has with the car when it's moving. You can't assume Tesla can slow down the car like OnStar can.
 
I kind of wish Tesla could have remotely shut the car down if it was a loaner.

There may be legal implications that prevented them from doing that. (Innocent-until-proven-guilty and so forth.) It perhaps would have to be implemented in such a way that the police could control it directly, though even that gets into a slippery slope. What if the police remotely interfere with the car's behavior, which then still crashes, and the driver (or anyone affected) sues the police for causing the crash? That said, I obviously do wish a remote speed-limiter had been employed in this case.
 
This reminds me of the Enzo Ferrari that split in half after hitting a telephone pole on the 101 just north of Malibu around 8 years ago. I saw the engine compartment laying in the street and the front half near the telephone pole around 200 feet away. Fortunately after hitting the pole neither piece of the car hit anything else. Amazingly the driver just walked away with only scratches and was apprehended later by the police.

http://www.wreckedexotics.com/special/enzo/
 
Thanks for the link. Quote: (police sergeant) "...Campbell said one of the theft suspects was ejected from the Tesla, possibly through the windshield."

Wasn't wearing his seatbelt. Idiot. Amazing he is still alive. Based on the photo GasDoc posted up thread, it appears to have been the driver who went through the windshield.
 
There may be legal implications that prevented them from doing that. (Innocent-until-proven-guilty and so forth.) It perhaps would have to be implemented in such a way that the police could control it directly, though even that gets into a slippery slope. What if the police remotely interfere with the car's behavior, which then still crashes, and the driver (or anyone affected) sues the police for causing the crash? That said, I obviously do wish a remote speed-limiter had been employed in this case.

I dont think there is any legal problem with slowly stopping stolen car - OnStar already does this.