Nope, wrong again. The Microsoft Lumia 950 and 950XL were released at the end of 2015, and they just
ended support in December of 2019. So they have been unsupported for just a little over one month.
But yes, my phone is just over 4 years old. (And it still has a better camera than most of the current phones on the market.)
Take a photo of this thread on its browser in the left trunk cubby! Free iPhone! (or whatever you prefer)
For anyone still clinging to the myths that Tesla didn't institute batterygate and chargegate over fires and nothing else, I implore you to read exactly what they told you about the fires and why they were instituting chargegate and batterygate to try and reduce how many Teslas were burning. Here are their exact words:
"We currently have well over half a million vehicles on the road, which is more than double the number that we had at the beginning of last year, and Tesla's team of battery experts uses that data to thoroughly investigate incidents that occur and understand the root cause. Although fire incidents involving Tesla vehicles are already extremely rare and our cars are 10 times less likely to experience a fire than a gas car, we believe the right number of incidents to aspire to is zero.
As we continue our investigation of the root cause, out of an abundance of caution, we are revising charge and thermal management settings on Model S and Model X vehicles via an over-the-air software update that will begin rolling out today, to help further protect the battery and improve battery longevity."
Lets explain this to those of you that want Tesla's words to be "misinterpreted":
This was said the same day Tesla released 2019.16 - It is no coincidence "
we are revising charge and thermal management settings on Model S and Model X vehicles via an over-the-air software update that will begin rolling out today" refers to 2019.16 or that 2019.16 had some seriously problematic revisions to charge and thermal settings. This update instituted batterygate and chargegate - charge and thermal settings - and we see it in our cars.
This entire press statement is about fires. Absolutely no other topic is mentioned. It starts with Tesla's fire safety. It tells us Tesla is internally investigating root causes for parked car fires, and it tells us they are taking direct action to try and stop it.
Tesla is not conjecturing. This is not an opinion or a hypothesis, it is Tesla's plain English explanation of why they felt they had to implement OTA updates that capped nearly every aspect of our cars' performance.
Several people are claiming Tesla "misinterpreted that sentence" or something. That is unfortunately out of touch - for starters the press release is long and thorough about its discussion of fires and actions taken to bring down the number of cars that catch fire, with no room to interpret individual sentances among the whole. It doesn't matter what any of us try to claim, we can't take back their words. Tesla said exactly those words, there is no misinterpretation possible and their words were carefully crafted to deliver the news with as soft a blow as possible while acknowledging they were responding to a rash of fires. This is not an interpretation, it is the English language at its simplest. The only interpretation going on is inside your skull, in your Broca's Area where language is interpreted.
None of us wanted Tesla to cause damages to our cars, but they did. Unfortunately, denying what they said will not undo what they did. Denial is a natural part of the reaction cycle, but it should be shorter term. For anyone new to this topic or still not past Denial, I urge you to read Post #1 as the majority of us are long past that stage of grieving over what Tesla did to us. We're all sympathetic to what they did to you, but it can't be undone as simply as claiming their actions and words are "misinterpreted." I wish it could.
