-
Want to remove ads? Register an account and login to see fewer ads, and become a Supporting Member to remove almost all ads.
@bonnie, I am flattered to have you looking through all the feedbacks in this thread and manage the direction where it should go. We all will respect to disagree.
pdxgibby
Software Engineer
jelloslug
Active Member
@jelloslug That makes absolutely no sense, ignore it.
@Ying If you believe you are right, @wk057 can exonerate you. He's proven Tesla was incorrect on other issues in the past and his credentials are unquestionable. Take him up on his offer.
@Ying If you believe you are right, @wk057 can exonerate you. He's proven Tesla was incorrect on other issues in the past and his credentials are unquestionable. Take him up on his offer.
I appreciate the offer and I will certainly do so after Tesla gives me their log. SO there is a point to map it.
The electricity footprint is a result of design failure or defect. I am not saying there is one, but we have to review before we make any conclusion. At this point, Tesla rejected to look at my car and provide the log.
Tesla is not going to let every customer who experiences unintended acceleration tie up their engineers with questions.
If you really can't let it go, hire a lawyer and see if you can subpoena some design data from Tesla. However, wk057 has already described the basic design.
If you really can't let it go, hire a lawyer and see if you can subpoena some design data from Tesla. However, wk057 has already described the basic design.
So... Now I'm starting to worry about if you are really trying to find out the truth/cause, or trying to enforce a position that you know is an uphill battle to get Tesla to release information, and are trying to deflect your mistake to make Tesla look bad.
Last edited:
I agree, engineering resource is precious and we are fighting with odds.
Does anyone see this paragraph in owners manual and please correct me if I was wrong- if I have to go by my insurance to repair the car, Tesla will have to give me the log. After receiving the log, I will certainly seek a third party to map the log.
https://www.tesla.com/sites/default/files/model_s_owners_manual_north_america_en_us.pdf page 182, on top of right side of the page
In addition, Tesla does not disclose the data recorded to an owner unless it pertains to a non-warranty repair service and in this case, will disclose only the data that is related to the repair.
If there is a design or a fundamental flaw I would expect it would happen at random times or at atleast at slow speeds of less than 5 mph.
But why does it happen - all the reported cases of SUA - only at a parking spot just at the moment the driver is expected to press the brakes?
The car somehow seems to know the driver's intent to park !
But why does it happen - all the reported cases of SUA - only at a parking spot just at the moment the driver is expected to press the brakes?
The car somehow seems to know the driver's intent to park !
Based on what is written there. Nothing will be needed/necessary to be disclosed to make the repair.
Last edited:
Oddly that is exactly what jelloslug is trying to say with his funny cartoon
Tam
Well-Known Member
I interpret this as: If you don't intend to claim this accident under the warranty then it is under "non-warranty repair service" (your insurance pays, not Tesla pays) so you as an owner should be qualified for the car log.
You have pointed out a blatant fact- there are multiple cases hanging there not only during parking, it happened when making turns as well. Whenever you car slows down, the SUA might happen.
Isn't making turns precisely the time when someone would press their brakes ?
My Tesla has un-intended acceleration episodes all the time....at least according to my passengers
No that is unwanted, or unexpected, acceleration.
SucreTease
Teslarian
Buddyroe
Active Member
So this guy says the point of this thread is to get the logs - that's all. So then wk057 tells him he will get the logs for him. The guy ignores that offer. Then Bonnie, who had actually taken up for the guy, says, "take wk057 up on his offer" - he says they'll have to agree to disagree. Disagree with what??? That wk057 will give him EXACTLY what he wants....the logs?
Man, I SO wish I had not wasted 15 minutes of my life reading this thread - not only filled with BS, but riddled with piss-poor grammar (not that my grammar is perfect).
Man, I SO wish I had not wasted 15 minutes of my life reading this thread - not only filled with BS, but riddled with piss-poor grammar (not that my grammar is perfect).
Similar threads
