Not likely. I don't think I've ever seen a supercharger go from breaking ground to live in less than a month.Well if they can get started Oct. 1. They should be able to plop that in before the snow flies.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not likely. I don't think I've ever seen a supercharger go from breaking ground to live in less than a month.Well if they can get started Oct. 1. They should be able to plop that in before the snow flies.
Okay so we just changed from "before the snow flies" to "before the ground freezes solid."That area usually doesn't have freeze up until at least mid Nov. I'm talking freezing the ground solid.
I'm waiting for somebody to say that it is impossible.Okay so we just changed from "before the snow flies" to "before the ground freezes solid."
In any case, it's not going to happen before winter.
Ok. It's impossible. Now, in Tesla time, it will be done 6 mo later.I'm waiting for somebody to say that it is impossible.
And then Elon will do it.
And I'd like to see that.
You'd have to provide more proof than a vague address to do that. For now he could just remove the blue dot.Heads up, @BlueShift :
The permit address for the Alexandria, MN USA location is no longer 3181 Evergreen Ln. That site is killed, so probably makes sense to remove that bubble. The new permit is under a prominent Minnesota-based company located on the 4400 block of Hwy 29 in Alexandria, MN. So go ahead and move the bubble
Super excited!
I'm not surprised, but they should have made an exception for North Dakota.Superchargers are on hold until the end of this quarter or the next quarter by Tesla so they can show profitability. Heard that from my internal source/employee.
Dirty from an electrical signal perspective? Wow.I was told the first location has such dirty power it was deemed unusable. I have no info on why it took 6 months to change the plan.
Agreed, that is really strange to hear. I wonder what their threshold is for dirty power.Dirty from an electrical signal perspective? Wow.
And now that I search the Gopher State One database, it looks like the same contractor that was hired at the initial Pilot Gas Station site (3181 Evergreen) subsequently requested a survey at the site 4404 Hwy 29 (sorry, I was being coy earlier) on 4/19/18:
Search and Status
The difference between the Pilot station and the new station (and why I couldn't find it earlier) is that the Pilot station had the "work done for" listed as Tesla, but the new site has the "work done for" listed as themselves (i.e. Design Tree)
Certain it's for Tesla?
Electrify America also has a deal with a "prominent Minnesota-based company".
The "aging grid" doesn't get dirty power from being old. There can be transmission related noise from triplen harmonics, but a simple remedy for that has been around since the 1950s. Noise generally comes from motors, switch gear and electronic loads in the local neighborhood. Tesla's rectifiers and related equipment are actually some of the "misbehaving" loads. Tesla equipment requires clean power, but dirties it up for the neighbors. A CCS/Chademo nearby will do the same.Most of the aging grid is going to have some form of dirty power. Would think SC would have the components to clean up whatever the problem with the supply lines.
Not sure. I'm an electrical engineer but I'm not in their "In" group.Interesting. How does tesla handle it at SC already installed?