Why would any Tesla owner want to use any of these with Superchargers available?
And now that we ACTUALLY have a Supercharger in Fort Stockton, what other non-Tesla EV could even make use of any of these charging stations in Fort Stockton?
Thread got a bit OT here. Someone mentioned they plan to use the San Antonio EA when visiting there, because the San Antonio SC is still in permitting hell.
To bring back to relevance to Fort Stockton; Yes, mostly EA is just shadowing the general location of Tesla SC for now, and unlikely you'd have use for paying x2 to x4 as much for charging at an EA, for less than half the charging speed, in that case. But maybe if there was some sort of huge, unusually high Tesla traffic, like during the West Texas rally?
I've seen locally here on FB people going on very long road trips still asking to borrow ChaDEMO adapters (they're a few hundred dollars), so there may end up being uses for shorter range Teslas in some areas, or "just in case"?
EDIT: A real life example; During the recent Space-X launch in California there were reportedly hundreds of Tesla's that showed up from long distance. This created long waits at local SCing. Extra charging option of EA could have been helpful in a case like this, 50kW is still about 3x as fast as the maximum for L2. Or at least it'll be helpful until there are a lot more non-Tesla EVs on the road, and the EA stations become busy.
One thing (good and bad) about EA's pricing is that it'll discourage clogging by hybrids and slow charging. For nearly all plug-in hybrids VW's pricing strategy of "they'll pay as much as with gas" means it's normally going to be cheaper for for the hybrid to just fill up with dino juice.
Remember that VW, and ergo EA, isn't in the transformation-of-energy-use-in-transportation business. Which is pretty crazy for a spun out company named "Electrify America".