houstonian
ಠ_ಠ
It was kicked around in another thread - see quote below:First time I’ve heard this brought up. It’s a very good point and worth remembering.
The peril Tesla faces is a class action arguing a subset of people who paid for FSD at the time of purchase viewed Tesla's written statements about FSD as necessary, even if not sufficient, for buying the car.
...in other words, if such a purchaser had known then what we know now (i.e. Tesla's running late on bringing FSD to the market, concerns about hardware redundancy, etc.), they would have never opted to buy the car.
FWIW I am pleased with my AP2.0, MCU1 S75D but I am also displeased with Tesla's lack of communication.
I get developing this takes time and there's a huge component of "you don't know what you don't know" but if Tesla at the very least put out quarterly updates about FSD and other items owners care about - battery limiting, MCU1 > MCU_new upgrades, etc come to mind - I think much of the justifiable angst felt by customers could be ameliorated.
tl;dr - I'm not upset complex things take time to develop, I'm upset there's no consistent communication.
While I disagree with the logic here but will add it will be much harder to prove in a court of law this [the potential to eventually secure FSD] was a verifiable, necessary factor in one's purchase decision compared to those who actually ponyed up the cash at the time of purchase.If you didn't buy it, Tesla doesn't owe you anything.
Turning back to the topic of a MCU upgrade, I am interested in one. Since I've got a MCU1 with a known flaw via the memory chip, I'd much rather have it replaced with a quicker/better one, even if paying for it out of my own pocket.
I'd be pissed if Tesla left me no option but to replace the flawed MCU1 with another flawed MCU1 at my own expense.
Long story short: I don't mind going out of pocket for an MCU upgrade, but will greatly resent doing so just to set myself up for the same issues caused by MCU1.