In two and a half years, I've only had one time where the range on the 85 would have been useful.
...
For example, I've driven from LA to Portland and LA to Napa, and back. Frequently, I'd arrive at a SC site with my 60 at about the same time as an 85. We both take about the same amount of time to re-charge and then we're off. At the next SC station, we'd both pull up again at about the same time. We take about the same time to re-charge and then we're off.
That right there's a testimonial of good SC coverage.
the number of drivers in California is way more than that of almost any other place. That would mean that 100 drivers per day would have to take that hypothetical 30-60 minute detour
The need for sufficient support where it's heavily used is not in dispute. In your house, by way of analogy, you don't want a breaker/conductor that's so thin that there are times that charging the car pops the breaker (delay/inconvenience). Got it. Size the capacity for the job. But on that same hand, you wouldn't plan to support HVAC
and a water heater
and a dryer on that same circuit long-term either.
You'd get overload and have to defer drying laundry when you have a priority car charge to do. So, best practice, you relegate the clothes drying to the laundry room, and "build" a car charge circuit sufficient for car charging, you don't call in a sparky to upgrade, overbuild the car charge circuit for HPWC+HVAC+laundry... Hey, if your HPWC gets a special kWh rate, doing so would even be an ethical consideration.
while just a handful of drivers out in the middle of nowhere needs to do a 300-600 mile detour a few times per year.
To continue the analogy. Besides having adequate "conductors" in place for large loads, another necessity is getting the power to the other side of the house.
Which means bridging [conduit] across "nowhere" areas [nobody lives in the attic] to make it possible to get between "somewheres." Better practice than schlepping and plugging in extension cords to use the second bedroom or have light on the patio. Even if it's not daily that you do those.
Check my location: Not In Cal. Regardless, I
am an advocate for beefing up the capacity where the sites are congested. Very important. I
agree it's more necessary where there are many Teslas.
But "congested" = filled with travelers, the garageless (aka hi-occ condo/apartment), and those that need a quick turnaround. Sure, even those driving their
personal car for hire, aka the "Bjørns" and "Übers."
GASP! No really, IOW when it's about saving valuable time, not misering money.
I also assume owners are already setting an example of disconnecting their own more
elective, nice-to-have session when the site approaches capacity. Like we do here. Yes, we do. We saw San Marcos' 5 stalls fill up yesterday but it wasn't going to cause any new arrivals a delay because drivers with lower need either unplugged or stood by to vacate the stall.
Got Congestion? Absolutely, light up more stalls at more sites. But in parallel, set a good example for newer owners still in the "gee-whiz" phase of omg-phree-phuel-4-teh-car'z-lyfe.
TL;DR - peer-to-peer education combats hoarding-related congestion.
TL;DR II - "Flyover Country" is not actually expressing CalifEnvy, but rather is worthy of becoming Driveover Country.
See The Letter To Locals as a clue (to Tesla Motor's intent). It's the official message. They are not being passive about that potential cause of congestion, nor should we.
All of us can reinforce TM's abuse-prevention outreach and accept that
a stall saved is a stall earned.
Or maybe Waste Not, Wait Not?