ZachF
Active Member
I honestly couldn't care less about plaid or plaid+. I know that some people here have ordered them, but hey, we are investors, we are likely in the top 10% (or 1%) financially. Thinking as an investor (not a plaid customer) lets remember that:
Teslas future is in average or low cost cars. It has to be, as thats the mission. Getting a few thousand multi-millionaires to swap their Lamborghini for Teslas is great for bragging rights, but useless for reducing emissions. Those cars are not exactly daily drivers.
- 99% of tesla's potential customers have never heard of the plaid or the plaid+
- 99% of tesla's potential customers cannot afford either
- 99% of people couldn't tell the difference performance wise between the P100D ludicrous and the plaid, let alone plaid+.
I know 'halo effect' and all that, but for crying out loud, my 2015 85D model S is considered *stupidly fast* by absolutely everyone I've ever given a ride. Tesla already have the 'our cars are insanely high performance' branding absolutely locked down. Nobody is swapping from a model 3 to a Nissan leaf because the plaid+ got cancelled.
TL;DR: Plaid+ or no, it makes absolutely diddly-squat difference to the company valuation.
Disagree completely.
The Model S is Tesla's advertising. It's why Tesla can get away with a $0 advertising budget.... It's literally the single car that made EVs cool.
That may change a bit when the Roadster comes, but it's true now until it does
Before the Model S EVs were funky, slow and (lets be honest here) POSs.