Reuters: "Tesla to Build Landfill Full of Discarded 3rd Row Seats Using Sudanese Child Laborers."
-
Want to remove ads? Register an account and login to see fewer ads, and become a Supporting Member to remove almost all ads.
Tesla, TSLA & the Investment World: the Perpetual Investors' Roundtable
- Thread starter AudubonB
- Start date
Reuters: "Tesla to Build Landfill Full of Discarded 3rd Row Seats Using Sudanese Child Laborers."
Buckminster
Well-Known Member
Threads of the day:
EV and Battery Credits - LFP & 7 seats for IRA
The demise of the OEMs - IRA unlikely to help Ford etc. much
Tesla Optimus Sub-Prime Robot - Will Optimus get a mention at ER in just 3 weeks?
Tesla mining and refining - Corpus Christi etc.
EV and Battery Credits - LFP & 7 seats for IRA
The demise of the OEMs - IRA unlikely to help Ford etc. much
Tesla Optimus Sub-Prime Robot - Will Optimus get a mention at ER in just 3 weeks?
Tesla mining and refining - Corpus Christi etc.
These....bastages....this is the "correction" to the previous hit piece.
www.marketwatch.com
How Elon Musk Dodged a Potential Margin Call Bullet by Following His Own Advice
The Tesla CEO might regret buying the social-media platform, but he doesn't have to regret the way he financed it.
www.marketwatch.com
A new Twitter CEO, and 9 other things Elon Musk should do to revive Tesla investors' faith in stock, according to an analyst
One analyst has laid out his top 10 priorities for a Tesla turnaround next year. Priority No. 1? "Name a CEO of Twitter by the end of January."
www.marketwatch.com
A new Twitter CEO, and 9 other things Elon Musk should do to revive Tesla investors' faith in stock, according to an analyst
One analyst has laid out his top 10 priorities for a Tesla turnaround next year. Priority No. 1? "Name a CEO of Twitter by the end of January."
www.marketwatch.com
A new Twitter CEO, and 9 other things Elon Musk should do to revive Tesla investors’ faith in stock, according to an analyst
(Dan Ives)Priority No. 1? “Name a CEO of Twitter by the end of January.”
Priority No. 2, Ives said, was: “Stop selling stock and no more boy that cried wolf or Pinocchio situation.”
Priority No. 3 involves cutting back on Musk’s typically aggressive growth forecasts for Tesla. “Lay out conservative 2023 delivery and targets given the darker macro,” he wrote. “The 50% growth target is not happening in our opinion, with 35%+ delivery growth a more hittable and realistic goal for 2023.”
No. 4 on that list called for greater attention on Tesla, rather than Twitter
No. 5 called for announcing Cybertruck deliveries will begin by the end of next year, amid concerns about competition and production
No. 6 called for changes to Tesla’s board to add more people with experience in tech and electric vehicles.
No. 7: A big share buyback.
No. 8: More financial metrics and “transparency” around margins.
Amazingly, the number in the headlines does not match what he number in the article.
Edit: rearranged link to make sure people didn’t think these were my opinions.
Last edited:
Where do you source these wise board members who have more experience with EVs than Tesla’s current board?
Call-out to you record-keepers, if you please:
How does today’s TSLA volume compare, split-adjusted, with other high volume days?
How does today’s TSLA volume compare, split-adjusted, with other high volume days?
barely fell short of yesterday.. by a percentage point or 2. I am sure dodger will make a nice table for us tonight.
DanCar
Active Member
Quote:
Tesla is expected to release its Q4 2022 global production and delivery numbers on Monday, January 2nd. The numbers were released on the 2nd day of the month for the past 11 quarters. The estimated release time is around 8:55 am Pacific Time.
Tesla is expected to release its Q4 2022 global production and delivery numbers on Monday, January 2nd. The numbers were released on the 2nd day of the month for the past 11 quarters. The estimated release time is around 8:55 am Pacific Time.
Thanks. I assume they will eventually ramp up to capacity also. Wondering where they are currently and how long a ramp would take in terms of cell supply. The link doesn't specifically address those questions. Important since there is a discussion on twitter being hyped about Tesla Energy, especially for 2023. I'd love for it to be true, but Tesla energy has been trying to ramp for a long time and I wonder how reasonable it is for when meaningful profits could flow into this division.
Xepa777
Banned
Tom Zhu interview for those wanting to get to know more about him. This was a multipart interview and has english subtitles available.
Quite interesting because Tom's daily work itinerary, relationship with Elon, Tesla China relations, and Tesla China operations and culture are covered in the series.
Quite interesting because Tom's daily work itinerary, relationship with Elon, Tesla China relations, and Tesla China operations and culture are covered in the series.
Institutions loaded up huge on Tesla shares. [Edit: I think this is wrong - the percentages almost for sure did not take into account of the stock split. 600M shares x 3 would be 1.8B shares (vs 1.586B). So the institutions actually sold, meaning retail investors bought.]
Way back machine: Oct 29, 2022 -
Nov 10, 2022
Current: Dec 29, 2022
Source: Fintel
Way back machine: Oct 29, 2022 -
| Institutional Shares (Long) | 617,932,989 - 19.57% (ex 13D/G) - change of shares - change of % MRQ |
Nov 10, 2022
| Institutional Shares (Long) | 749,381,511 - 23.73% (ex 13D/G) - change of shares - change of % MRQ |
Current: Dec 29, 2022
| Institutional Shares (Long) | 1,586,542,149 - 50.24% (ex 13D/G) - change of shares - ch |
Source: Fintel
Last edited:
The issue is that Treasury Dept. has determined that leasing IS a commercial use. Thus, leasing companies are eligible for the CCVC, which they may pass along to the consumer in the form of reduced lease payments. See Topic G, on the last three pages of the IRS fact sheet:
This seems to negate all of the IRA's new requirements - maximum MSRP, domestic manufacture, and income limits - if the EV is leased, rather than purchased. This would have large implications for both Tesla and foreign EV makers.
What am I missing???
A legacy media journalist losing credibility is like a seasoned prostitute losing virginity.
do those numbers take splits into account? the huge jumps makes it look like it is using number of shares at that particular time, not split adjusted. eg it took a huge step up about 5x number of shares around the time of the 5-1 split. similar for the 3-1 split
Mach-E owner "I am going to throw this in the trash and go get a Tesla" after waiting in line trying to charge and all the stations are down.
This is a major issue in the U.S and kudos to Kyle who puts in the hard work trying to make the network better by blasting all of these other company's. Good video to watch if you want to learn about how 3rd party networks operate and what people felt the past week owning an EV. It's not pretty and many are going back to gas.
This is a major issue in the U.S and kudos to Kyle who puts in the hard work trying to make the network better by blasting all of these other company's. Good video to watch if you want to learn about how 3rd party networks operate and what people felt the past week owning an EV. It's not pretty and many are going back to gas.
Thanks for that.
I was misreading the clause as purchase or lease, not to use or lease out.
"meets the requirements of section 30D(d)(1)(C) and is acquired for use or lease by the taxpayer and not for resale"
This would be a giant head fake. That would mean the leasing agency would collect the rebate, not the consumer.
That has always been the case with the tax credit. In the past most companies have passed the credit, or at least most of it, on to the lessor.
I've seen a lot of utterly moronic things from government. But calling any Model Y a SUV is a huge stretch (IMO it's a compact crossover-no OHV capability). But saying an extra 2 seats suddenly makes it an SUV? Um...no.
It has. But then we had all the "big changes" enacted with the recent IRA legislation. Now, it seems those changes have been effectively overturned by the IRS - all you need to do is lease to get around those new rules. That's why Senator Manchin has been begging for different regulation and threatening new legislation (good luck with that, Senator Joe!).
What kind of idiots do we have running our government?
Similar threads
- Locked
- Locked
