I hope you're right. I definitely agree that the board expects the vote to go their way. Otherwise, putting this proposal up for vote would be complete fiduciary malfeasance. I just don't know how tight the vote is going to be. They mentioned 4 out of top 10 institutional investors have indicated they are a yes. Hope I'm wrong, but that doesn't sound like a slam dunk. I understand this doesn't mean the other 6 are a no. And what about the likes of Koguan Leo, who now owns 27,600,000 shares and appears to be a no vote? Per his X post, this is more shares than Cathie Wood and Ron Baron combined???
I agree with those that think this is the most urgent issue we have to overcome. Q1 earnings? Meh. Earnings call commentary? Slightly less meh. Shareholder vote in June? Critical. If this proposal isn't passed, I see only bad things in the near-to-mid future. And maybe even long term, as some are suggesting.