Do people still listen to Ludacris?
Personally, I want a ludicrous mode that drops 0-60 to under 3 seconds.
While I would love this, I have a feeling Tesla won't offer it, so they can preserve the Model S/X sales.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Do people still listen to Ludacris?
Personally, I want a ludicrous mode that drops 0-60 to under 3 seconds.
I think what they demo'ed is that they can defeat ESC and traction control. I think it's highly probable that they did this by tweaking sensors, not software.Mountain Pass Performance demo'd some pretty impressive track software already... they won't be the only ones.
Probably voids the warranty and may create a 'jail-broken' situation, but that's what you risk going aftermarket for 'real performance' Tesla or not.
Where do I need big brakes here? @4:30I still don't understand how people ignored the available facts regarding the standard brakes being insufficient for track use, yet are complaining about missing out on a feature that is for track use.
I think what they demo'ed is that they can defeat ESC and traction control. I think it's highly probable that they did this by tweaking sensors, not software.
From insideevs (Watch This Tweaked Tesla Model 3 Drift): "In order to get this Model 3 to drift, Sasha disables its electronic stability control and traction control systems, while leaving the anti-lock braking system intact. This is all part of a “defeat” system that Sasha and his team have been able to create."
An earlier article talks about their desire to get to the software in aspirational form (Mountain Pass Performance Uncorks Tesla Model 3 Performance & Takes To The Track (#CleanTechnica Exclusive) | CleanTechnica): "Cracking that nut is a big leap from where the team is today, as it will require that they effectively disconnect the car from Tesla’s servers and updates and load up their own software."
That's a huge engineering effort. If they were a "big leap" away on Jul. 7th, I doubt that they would have the software ready a month later.
BTW: If Tesla did the security right, this is an all-or-nothing deal. i.e., the only way to replace the software would be to replace it completely - which means recreating *everything* in the current software - it's not a matter of tweaking a module here or there. Any tampering should cause the software to be marked as invalid.
I'm highly skeptical that anyone will release third-party software without Tesla's cooperation. The closest that we might get is for people design overlay computers that manipulate the inputs from sensors to Tesla's hardware and get the software to behave a certain way based on the modified input values (e.g., tell the car it's not sliding, when it actually is). Since this is an extremely indirect form of control, the capabilities of those systems will be limited (and there are strategies Tesla can use to defeat this type of system).
I'd like to see Tesla enable an after-market, but so far there's no indication they have any intention to do so.
Where do I need big brakes here?
At about 5:30 he mentions that the brakes have faded somewhat, AKA they're overheated to an degree which is exactly what the bumped up performance brakes are designed to address.
Presumably they would load their own very basic software temporarily. You don't need your bluetooth connectivity or EAP at the track. I agree that it sounds very difficult without some sort of inside information.I think what they demo'ed is that they can defeat ESC and traction control. I think it's highly probable that they did this by tweaking sensors, not software.
From insideevs (Watch This Tweaked Tesla Model 3 Drift): "In order to get this Model 3 to drift, Sasha disables its electronic stability control and traction control systems, while leaving the anti-lock braking system intact. This is all part of a “defeat” system that Sasha and his team have been able to create."
An earlier article talks about their desire to get to the software in aspirational form (Mountain Pass Performance Uncorks Tesla Model 3 Performance & Takes To The Track (#CleanTechnica Exclusive) | CleanTechnica): "Cracking that nut is a big leap from where the team is today, as it will require that they effectively disconnect the car from Tesla’s servers and updates and load up their own software."
That's a huge engineering effort. If they were a "big leap" away on Jul. 7th, I doubt that they would have the software ready a month later.
BTW: If Tesla did the security right, this is an all-or-nothing deal. i.e., the only way to replace the software would be to replace it completely - which means recreating *everything* in the current software - it's not a matter of tweaking a module here or there. Any tampering should cause the software to be marked as invalid.
I'm highly skeptical that anyone will release third-party software without Tesla's cooperation. The closest that we might get is for people design overlay computers that manipulate the inputs from sensors to Tesla's hardware and get the software to behave a certain way based on the modified input values (e.g., tell the car it's not sliding, when it actually is). Since this is an extremely indirect form of control, the capabilities of those systems will be limited (and there are strategies Tesla can use to defeat this type of system).
I'd like to see Tesla enable an after-market, but so far there's no indication they have any intention to do so.
Because he was also going for aggressive driving and not just drifting.At about 5:30 he mentions that the brakes have faded somewhat, AKA they're overheated to an degree which is exactly what the bumped up performance brakes are designed to address.
Because he was also going for aggressive driving and not just drifting.
I think aftermarket means:Now I’m really wondering if the P3D- with the newly announced aftermarket performance upgrade will be better and maybe even cheaper than the factory installed one. This could be possible if they found a way to ditch the 20s considering they are the least desired and one of the most expensive components of the performance upgrade package when looking at the standalone pricing. Anyway, there are so many possibilities that we will just be guessing about for who knows how long.
On a different note, Tesla mentioned they are working on an “aftermarket” performance upgrade package. How would you all interpret “aftermarket”? Could they be working with aftermarket part manufacturers on a completely different kit? Or could tesla parts that are installed after delivery be considered aftermarket? The latter doesn’t sound right to me.
Good for you and I don't mean it sarcastically. Tesla wants to play these unfair games then let them lose $10,000.This ride was too wild for me so I decided the easiest thing to do was get off. They let me downgrade my P3D- order to AWD even though delivery was scheduled for next week and I had a VIN so that's what I did. My wallet is $10,000 heavier so it kinda worked out. Good luck to everyone who are keeping their P3D- with whatever "aftermarket" upgrade kit Tesla ends up offering, I guess.
Great explanation on why you need big performance brakes for some casual drifting on a track.
This ride was too wild for me so I decided the easiest thing to do was get off. They let me downgrade my P3D- order to AWD even though delivery was scheduled for next week and I had a VIN so that's what I did. My wallet is $10,000 heavier so it kinda worked out. Good luck to everyone who are keeping their P3D- with whatever "aftermarket" upgrade kit Tesla ends up offering, I guess.
Possibly one or more of these:
1) It is a protest from buyers who hope that Tesla would listen to them like how Tesla lowered P3D from 78K to 64K. IMO, this may happen if majority of P3D- decides to downgrade to RWD or AWD. But I don't see that happening because not everyone is buying it for track.
2) The car is delivered and nothing much they can do other than hoping that upgrade shows up in Tesla shop. (like P85D ludicrous mode for regular P85D without underline.). There is some chance but don't bet on it.
3) No one wants to feel left out and get the second class treatment and this is particularly strong from P3D- because in their opinion, it is still same Performance Model 3 other than tires and red brakes.
4) Some people might have stretched their budget and extra 5K upgrade is just too much on top of their current configuration.
I kinda predicted the track mode would be exclusive to P3D+.
But what I am wondering is Ludicrous Mode. This is less predictable and I hate to admit it, but I think Tesla may again make it exclusive to PUP only.
There was a 100% path to take, and people chose not to take it. Perceived value of + package, and anything "aftermarket", etc is irrelevant to "solving" Tesla's pareto optimal decision making process.