Right, Twitter is the only trustworthy channel for News.There's your problem right there. You went to CNN for "news". Can't trust any of them.
/s
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Right, Twitter is the only trustworthy channel for News.There's your problem right there. You went to CNN for "news". Can't trust any of them.
This is me not taking the bait.There's your problem right there. You went to CNN for "news". Can't trust any of them.
I'm sorry to disagree, but this bothers me deeply. Professional journalism is one of the last lines of defence we have left in a world drowned in an ocean of actual fake news propagated by various nefarious agents via social media.There's your problem right there. You went to CNN for "news". Can't trust any of them.
The moment when you read a post like that and you almost hit "funny" as you take it for a joke, but you have this strange feeling you should pull up the CNN app as we live in a world when this may actually be true and when you check you find it really just did happen.
This is me not taking the bait.
I'm sorry to disagree, but this bothers me deeply. Professional journalism is one of the last lines of defence we have left in a world drowned in an ocean of actual fake news propagated by various nefarious agents via social media.
Yes, plenty of mainstream outlets publish or broadcast heavily slanted coverage that furthers the interests of their paymasters, and it's true there are many journalists out there who sold out a long time ago (virtually all the WSJ editorial writers, and every single opinion maker at Fox, for instance). And yes, most pick click-bait titles and engage in sensationalism in a desperate attempt to get viewers (mainly because the new economics of Internet advertising is threatening to obliterate the professional news business).
But real journalists do exist at every such organization, especially on the news side, and their already very hard job is made almost hopeless by the current "all-news-is-fake" narrative, pushed by rulers like Putin (covertly) or Trump (overtly), a narrative designed to make people not know what to believe anymore, and become ever more angry and cynical.
CNN is not "fake news". Neither is WSJ, the NYT, or Bloomberg. That doesn't mean you have to accept everything they say unquestionably; it means you have to learn who the bad actors are and avoid them. For every Sean Hannity there is a Shepard Smith. Don't let the professional news industry die because it's fashionable to be mistrustful of "the man", because then all we'll have left will be the unseen Twitter outrage manipulators turning us against each other and transforming the whole world into a huge, perpetual bar fight, while the crooks laugh all the way to the bank.
smaller more news-oriented REAL journalists who report without ideological tinting of their stories
You have the worst profile picture ever! It makes everything you say seem like it is coming from a snarky a hole. You could say "Congratulations on the birth of your first son!" to someone, and my gut reaction would be "f that guy." Find a better picture to use!My last post on this (sorry mods): completely disagree that all we'll have left is twitter. If the fake news like wsj, nyt, bloomberg, especially CNN AND FOX NEWS fold, then the smaller more news-oriented REAL journalists who report without ideological tinting of their stories, will prosper.
Yeah, but does it make me a retail mullet?( Don't bother to look that one up, Montana is degrading himself by calling Jonas an unregistered prostitute... )
Can we keep the Tesla posts to a minimum please, I thought this was a discussion forum about journalists and fake newsPossible Semi test mule video. Certainly takes off rather quietly.
Are you that’s what’s going on accounting-wise? If true what icing, they enable autopilot and on top of that margins suddenly get boosted!?Over 35,000 Tesla owners bought ‘fully self-driving’ feature despite still being unavailable
"<
Currently, that’s over $100 million worth of option that Tesla hasn’t delivered and technically can’t recognize revenue on until they enable it.
>"
Likely. It could also be about keeping Panasonic in check, lest they start Mobileeye type shenanigans.Just suddenly accrued to me that Tesla is using Samsung's cells for Australia TE project may be a deal with getting incentives from the South Korea government for their cars.
Over 35,000 Tesla owners bought ‘fully self-driving’ feature despite still being unavailable
"<
Currently, that’s over $100 million worth of option that Tesla hasn’t delivered and technically can’t recognize revenue on until they enable it.
>"
This metric is what gave value to recent acquisitions of self driving tech by traditional companies.I think many are missing the biggest news from this post. Over 1/3 of the 90,000 owners has purchased FSD and probably closer to 40%. That is unbelievable and shows you people really are ready for their cars to drive them around.
It definitely is. There is a line in there about deferred revenue. You can't claim revenue for a product that hasn't yet been delivered.Are you that’s what’s going on accounting-wise? If true what icing, they enable autopilot and on top of that margins suddenly get boosted!?
You forgot :
- they already had to recall early Model 3 production due to failures in the batteries
Bad welds. Much different than bad batteries.
Sure:Interesting
Can you provide a link?
And...?@SBenson 's post was about the cells and the packs.