You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Has it been confirmed that the SR Model S/X is still software limiting the battery?
It hasn't, but I strongly suspect this isn't the case. In fact I suspect the "75" has returned as 285 rated miles is exactly 10% improvement over the 259 rating of the prior 75D.
The blog post said S, X owners. Elon (on conf call) said any Tesla owner.Sounds like any current tesla owner can get ludicrous for free - don't see anything about trading in with tesla...
Only question is how long to wait before ordering to make sure they have the new drivetrain figured out, but not so long that they rescind the Free Ludicrous offer.
The blog post said S, X owners. Elon (on conf call) said any Tesla owner.
Curious if Elon's word or the blog post wins if a Roadster or 3 owner asks about the "free" Ludicrous.
Tesla has said it costs them in higher warranty repair costs. Parts wear down rapidly if many ludicrous launches are done.Ludicrous doesn't cost them anything, I wouldn't be surprised if they offer it to any owner .
Ludicrous doesn't cost them anything, I wouldn't be surprised if they offer it to any owner .
It certainly does if they give it to someone who would have otherwise paid for it.
Exactly. There is a very real $20k opportunity cost.
Given all the other updates and upgrades in the new MS/MX, I suspect a non-insignificant number of existing owners would have upgraded anyway, including the Ludicrous upgrade. It happens every time Tesla rolls out something new, and people want (or need) to always have the 'latest and greatest'.
Think of all those folks who instantly upgraded from P85D to the P90D, only to upgrade again shortly after that when the P100D was released. It's like clockwork. I'd bet Tesla even as a list of "people most likely to upgrade."
Last year after receiving a direct hit from Hurricane Florence, Tesla Temporarily increased my range about 25% . This lasted around 3 months and jumped me from 335 to around 435. During this time I made one round trip of 350 miles and did not have to recharge. Returned home with 30 miles or so remaining. So, It would appear that they would not have to do anything other than software change to produce this increase. Wondering if it will have any effect on the battery. Wondering if Anyone can do anything to decrease the life span of the battery anyway. If you have this much buffer in a battery pack, it would be easy to make it look as if a battery has little or no degradation I also noticed the recommended daily charging went up to a top of chart range of about 300 miles. This makes me think that all of our charging strategies were for naught. I just flat out love this Bar, I mean Car. Never have I ever bough anything that has gotten better over time, with new and better features. It is a marvel. (May have to add a 20 year old bottle of Pappy to this statement)
I hope this does not start another seminar on batteries. I just want to be surprised if mine dies before I do.
Well, if you really hyper mile the Tesla and drive at 30mph with HVAC off, I think you can get almost 2X the rates range.350 miles trip at what speed? Like stuck in evacuation traffic doing under 20 mph for several hours?
Does anybody know if they have improved the cooling in the batterypack?
If the cells are the same, with the same chemistry as the older ones, and the coling is the same - why would the older ones not be able to get the faster 200Kw charging?
This is my hope that existing Model S will be able to achieve the new peak charge or at least lose to 200KW
I heard, on the ever-reliable Internet, that the cables from the charge port are thicker in the new models; this was apparently a limiting factor in the older ones. How true this is... No idea, but doesn't seem implausible to me.why would the older ones not be able to get the faster 200Kw charging?