You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So would I. An elk can weigh over 1000 lbs. and moose range up to 1500 lbs.
Finally someone who knows pickups does a detailed takedown of Doug. Very informative on exactly why Cybertruck is such a great value!
Thats not what I’m seeing. The mood is shifting for the positive in a big way towards the CT. Besides it really doesn’t matter what most people “think” right now. What actually matters as that once these get on the road and people truly understand it’s capabilities and toughness, these are going to sell even faster.
That is the Group Think in the pro Tesla echo chamber.
I don't read any nonsense from the Seeking Alpha TSLAQ crowd either.
I agree with your assessment. But I think that in addition to the chance that tastes might evolve as the Cybertruck starts roaming the streets, Tesla is also likely to evolve the design over the years ahead.My read is that traditional truck buyers are 90% against and 10% in favor of CT design. Not a lot of undecideds.
Full size trucks sales are ~3M per year in North America.
That could translate to 300k sales per year from traditional buyers, plus non-traditional buyers in North America plus RoW. According to ARK investments CT received ~1500 orders from Australia and ~3200 from the UK. Per capita that is about the same but I expected much higher orders per capita from Australia.
After there are a couple of thousand CT units roaming around Idaho and Wyoming it may become to seem normal. And therefore more palatable to traditional pickup buyers. Or it could end up more like a Prius. Iconic and selling well for what it is but never entering mainstream status and influencing overall vehicle design. It is impossible to know for sure how history will judge to the CT design.
Is there a forum that is a good example?
We’ll see. It seems there is way more buzz in Nebraska certainly than anything Tesla has done before. 2 people I know plan on buying it. That isn’t saying much but I’m the only one I know with a model 3 and nobody else had even reserved it. I don’t remember anyone here even noticing the Model Y launch but everyone has brought up the Truck. But... we are talking wealthy suburban people who would only really use it as a family vehicle.
I think most CT owners that plan to tow frequently will benefit from FSD:Also an open question how you park at the supercharger stall while towing a trailer...
Meanwhile, I enjoyed doing some crafts today with my daughter.
Ford of Dearborn has become a deer in the headlights.Disappointed in the shell of an auto company once called Ford.
heck, even Rivian-Rob's tastes might evolve at the sight of this majestic beast passing by:tastes might evolve as the Cybertruck starts roaming the streets
I disagree after owning an Avalanche for many years. There were latches on the inside that allowed me to easily turn the bed from 5’ to over 8’. A very nice feature for carrying plywood, 2x4 studs and couches.The pass-through would also need a locking mechanism, otherwise someone could shimmy into your truck through it if you kept the tonneau cover open.
Cool idea, but not very practical.
Cybertruck AWD ($50K version) will have the Raven powertrain from the S/X. Those are 18650 cells from Panasonic in Japan. There is also spare capacity on the S/X line right now, since they are down to 1 shift per day. At least all the powertrain components are available in volume now.While Cybertruck production shouldn't present any big hurdles, it will gobble up a lot of Nevada-made cells.
Cybertruck AWD ($50K version) will have the Raven powertrain from the S/X. Those are 18650 cells from Panasonic in Japan.
If they'd just make it so the charger would UNPLUG when you release it from the car that would be half the battle for minimal cost... an elastic or spring to retract and lift the unplugged cable out of the way and leave it high and dry maybe. As a wheelchair guy who has to wait for somebody to unplug the charger for me when I get bottled in at the supercharger because I'm trapped with not enough room for my wheelchair so not being able to get out and squeeze between the cars to get in my chair and unplug it myself, it would make life easier and help me vacate the charger stall faster after I'm charged.Or, don't drop the trailer, pull it down the highway, add a bunch of these
![]()
and you never have to stop for a charge!
It would be interesting to see some tests with moose and deer dummies. My thought is that the moose would go up and over the window so that the passengers would still be protected. Deer would just hit the front and crumple the crumple zone.I don't know where this idea that the Cybertruck is practically indestructible came from. If one hits a moose, elk or large deer at 65-75 mph with a Cybertruck, I'm pretty sure it will be totaled. But, yeah, the general toughness in the face of door dings, hail, shopping carts and the like is a *huge* benefit. I think a steel key would probably still be capable of putting a nice scratch in the door but you could probably just buff it out with some rubbing compound.
This is important from an investment perspective because it will make the truck that much more desirable (high demand).
But those are from the first impressions. Everyone needs a bit of time to "get over" a new design. In two years, the percentages will be quite different.My read is that traditional truck buyers are 90% against and 10% in favor of CT design. Not a lot of undecideds.
That is the Group Think in the pro Tesla echo chamber.
I don't read any nonsense from the Seeking Alpha TSLAQ crowd either.
But I do like to visit truck forums, conservative political forums, hunting forums to see what the "other" side is thinking. It is overwhelmingly but not 100% negative.
Of course postings,videos, and even $100 deposits don't matter.
What matters is sales in the future.
Nobody really knows.
Cybertruck AWD ($50K version) will have the Raven powertrain from the S/X. Those are 18650 cells from Panasonic in Japan. There is also spare capacity on the S/X line right now, since they are down to 1 shift per day. At least all the powertrain components are available in volume now.
All Tesla needs is another tent somewhere near the Fremont factory grounds, a laser cutter, metal brake and some used welding robots and they can start production in the third week of December...
Yeah, tongue in cheek, but I think at least the AWD (and RWD soon after) can enter production MUCH quicker than everyone imagines. That's why the 'weird' polygonal design was deemed neccesary. It's be YEARS faster than waiting for the metal casting machine that Tesla intends to use to mass produce stainless steel 1-piece exoskeleton truck bodys.
View attachment 482406
Yes, you read that right. That's what the 'huge casting machine' is for, not for Model Y bodies, which were always going to be conventional stamped mild steel and aluminum. Detroit doesn't have a single clue as to how much peril their businesses are in right now.
Since Elon's confirmed that SpaceX/Tesla are sharing costs of a steel foundry for making their own custom alloy of stainless steel, the last piece of the puzzle has fallen into place. Next gen trucks will have stainless steel 1-piece cast bodies; all the advantages of curved panels but no stamping required to form the compound curves.
But faceted Cybertruck goes to market ASAP. Elon's has a new mantra about timelines:
"If its tight its right; if its long its wrong"
Cheers!