TMC is an independent, primarily volunteer organization that relies on ad revenue to cover its operating costs. Please consider whitelisting TMC on your ad blocker and becoming a Supporting Member. For more info: Support TMC

AP1 Model S crossed yellow line during lane merge

Discussion in 'Model S: Driving Dynamics' started by phaduman, Apr 30, 2017.

  1. phaduman

    phaduman Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2016
    Messages:
    183
    Location:
    San Jose
    While driving down on CA-1 to Monterey yesterday 5PM, when left lane merged to right (reducing from 3 lane to 2 lanes), my car (autopilot engaged) couldn't follow the left yellow line (when the right side white lane divider disappeared for a while, the car has always followed the left yellow line to stay in the lane) and crossed it. I was watching closely (as everyone should) and gently nudged the steering wheel to get back into lane without disengaging AP. There were passengers taking nap and disengaging usually causes jerky movement that can wake them up. The car complied with the gentle steering pressure and didn't resist too much. I think if I had not taken action, I could have gone into the grassy left areas.

    What could be the reason for this AP1 failing to follow the well marked yellow lane marking in the absence of the other lane marking? Running the latest 8.1 firmware for AP1. the sun was on the right (ocean side) and I was driving south. Distance following was set to 5.
     
    • Informative x 1
  2. mkjayakumar

    mkjayakumar Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2012
    Messages:
    2,562
    Location:
    Plano, TX
    I have generally noticed that it doesn't follow yellow lines as good as white lines. it doesn't matter how clear the yellow line is. On the other hand a faint dashed white line it doesn't have any trouble, but a continuous yellow line it somehow misses more often than not.

    When you are on the left most lane, the white dashed lane markers to the right is what keeps it the lane, and once that disappears as in your case, it is wobbly. You did not record your dash in that video, and that would have told you the level of confidence on the yellow line at the point of merger.

    What speed where you going in this video?
     
  3. chillaban

    chillaban Active Member

    Joined:
    May 5, 2016
    Messages:
    1,636
    Location:
    Bay Area
    AP1 does not reliably handle disappearing lanes like that lane merge, and has no concept of yellow vs white lines (it's monochrome), and furthermore does not seem to understand ditches/grass vs road.

    As far as I can tell AP1 behaved like how I would expect it too. In the future if you don't want to disengage AP, you should initiate an auto-lane-change as soon as you see the lane ending markers. Or flick the lever to disengage AP.

    It's extremely dangerous to hold off on overriding Autosteer just because you're afraid of causing passengers mild discomfort. What if a car creeped next to you as you're being run off into the shoulder? Safety should be prioritized over perceived comfort difference, and I would've taken action and moved over to the non-ending lane as soon as I saw the arrows.
     
    • Like x 1
  4. phaduman

    phaduman Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2016
    Messages:
    183
    Location:
    San Jose
    71Mph on a 65 limit. The speed is embedded on the video (bottom center). I took the clip from the dashcam (Thinkware 770), don't have camera to record the dashboard - you have a good point - I will note that going forward - AP1's ability to read yellow lines vs. white lines.

    Point taken. The traffic was light on both front, back and sides. the car was crossing the yellow line rather gently - and reacted positively to my steering control. If it was not going to, I would have yanked it hard (yes, safety first - I have done those maneuvers before too).
     
    • Like x 1
  5. S4WRXTTCS

    S4WRXTTCS Active Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2015
    Messages:
    1,820
    Location:
    Snohomish, WA
    While the camera sensor is Monochrome it's likely more sensitive to white because of what white is.

    White is everything, and yellow is well not everything. :)

    Now without seeing the IC it's hard to say whether it was a detection issue or if it's intentionally designed to follow the right line while in the left lane.
     
  6. EV-lutioin

    EV-lutioin Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2016
    Messages:
    1,051
    Location:
    California
    The grass/road edge is fairly distinct in this situation, it is possible that AP was confused between the yellow line and the grass/road edge. Time to get the highway dept. to mow the grass! ;)
     
  7. Tam

    Tam Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2012
    Messages:
    2,371
    Location:
    Visalia, CA
  8. chillaban

    chillaban Active Member

    Joined:
    May 5, 2016
    Messages:
    1,636
    Location:
    Bay Area
    I was thinking about that video too. My experience with AP1 in construction zones is that it deeply wanted to believe in its prior knowledge map even when the world is dramatically different. I-5 had some construction zones where they diverted all of traffic onto the other side and despite a row of cones, a Road Closed sign, and multiple parked construction trucks, AP1 would consistently follow the erased lane line grooves instead of the newly painted shifted lane lines to the other side.
     
    • Informative x 3
  9. TampaRich

    TampaRich Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2013
    Messages:
    136
    Location:
    Tampa, FL
    The other problem looks like the car that AP was tracking merged right, and you were no longer tracking anyone. AP might have had a better chance if the driver in front of you had merged farther into the lane reduction.
     
  10. joebiker25

    joebiker25 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2016
    Messages:
    123
    Location:
    SF Bay Area, CA
    Pretty common in my car as well so I am ready to make manual corrections in merging lane scenarios. Driving in the leftmost/ #1/ carpool lane means dealing with the yellow line at all times.
     
  11. mkjayakumar

    mkjayakumar Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2012
    Messages:
    2,562
    Location:
    Plano, TX
    I commute that same section every freakin work day, and that Monday morning when they out of the blue shifted the lanes with that new concrete barrier, it took me by total surprise. Luckily for me the traffic was heavy and moving at around 25 mph and i was following another car, so my AP1 car perfectly swerved to follow the new lanes, but it sure shook me up because I couldn't see the lane shifting with a car so close in front of me.

    In the case of that video obviously with much higher speeds - I am guessing 45mph+ - AP1 couldn't handle it. And that shouldn't be a surprise to anyone.

    One thing though - i was damn lucky to be going at a low speed that day. Another 10 mph more I would have ended with the same fate.
     
    • Like x 1
  12. chillaban

    chillaban Active Member

    Joined:
    May 5, 2016
    Messages:
    1,636
    Location:
    Bay Area

    It's really the perfect cautionary tale for why even with AP1 so much more "stable" than AP2, why you STILL cannot let your attention off the road any longer with AP1 than you can with AP2... Things go from looking peachy to being an accident in like 2 seconds. Any amount of distracted AP supervision would've led you to the same fate. And that I don't believe can be fixed by a mapping crew combined with AP1-like hardware. It'll either need LIDAR that scans that low or a much more advanced vision processing system than is available today.
     
  13. mkjayakumar

    mkjayakumar Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2012
    Messages:
    2,562
    Location:
    Plano, TX
    Agreed. In fact it is the familiarity of that route - I know every inch of it - is a catalyst for accident when there is a sudden lane change with no warnings. Since that whole section of around 4 miles is a construction zone, there is no reason to use AP
     
  14. HankLloydRight

    HankLloydRight Fluxing

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2014
    Messages:
    7,529
    Location:
    Connecticut
    What firmware version are you on? Because AP1 in my car doesn't let me nudge it one centimeter without disengaging. Any attempt to nudge or direct the car the tiniest bit left or right results in disengagement.
     
  15. phaduman

    phaduman Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2016
    Messages:
    183
    Location:
    San Jose
    Knowing that accidents wi
    17.14.23, v8.1. Loaded on April 13.
    In most of my previous experiences it would indeed be disengaged. But I have also had occurrences where I have moved the car slightly to my left when a motorcycle is about to cross me on my right side while lane sharing, and maintain autosteer. Perhaps 3 out of 4 times, AP would disengage, but not always.
     
  16. PatrickCH4313

    PatrickCH4313 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2016
    Messages:
    112
    Location:
    Switzerland
    I can confirm, it doesn't follow yellow line (means construction/work in Europe) and I alway disengage the AP to prevent any trouble.(17.14.23)
     
  17. phaduman

    phaduman Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2016
    Messages:
    183
    Location:
    San Jose
    BTW, @HankLloydRight can try this:
    Put gentle and sustained pressure (< 4 lbs, per this article - table at the end - likely force required to disengage autosteer in Tesla) on either left or right spoke of the steering wheel using just a finger, and notice that the car changes direction slightly. The slower the car, the longer the time it takes to notice the slight change in direction. It would be interesting to see if the autosteer allows this slight change in direction to continue beyond lane boundaries without disengaging.
     
  18. calisnow

    calisnow Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2014
    Messages:
    2,228
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    Oh come off it man - he doesn't need your lecture. You're not the safety czar. He posted the video to show a flaw and I agree with him. You weren't in the car - you've no idea whether his decision was safe or not.
     
  19. calisnow

    calisnow Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2014
    Messages:
    2,228
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    No. It doesn't need lidar and it doesn't need a much more advanced vision processing system than is available today - I have AP2 and AP1. AP2 handles disappearing lanes without going off the road. AP1 does what the OP showed it doing - it's done it to me multiple times. Why is this? I've no idea.
     
  20. HankLloydRight

    HankLloydRight Fluxing

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2014
    Messages:
    7,529
    Location:
    Connecticut
    Believe me, I've tried everything to get it to nudge over a few inches when passing people while AP is engaged. As I increase pressure on the steering wheel, the car does not move one millimeter, until I get to the point of disengagement, which isn't much. Even with sustained pressure just below that point, car does not move. It's extremely frustrating, especially since people report that earlier versions of AP1 did allow such nudging or adjustments.
     

Share This Page