Audi's system will exceed Tesla.
Audi e-Tron Electric Car To Offer 150-kW Quick Charging Sites
If I had a dollar for every Audi EV press release...
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Audi's system will exceed Tesla.
Audi e-Tron Electric Car To Offer 150-kW Quick Charging Sites
This is like the battery of the week that will replace the current batteries. All hype, no facts.You are speaking present tense with LG/Bolt and BMW. While there's evidence that BMW is using it in the i3, it's likely a bit early to determine how effective it is. The article only hypothesizes that the Bolt will have it, so it's definitely too early there.
As for kludge? Please.
The dual-loop design also allows waste heat from the drive unit or the pack heaters to use the same plumbing to also warm the batteries in cold weather, avoiding separate systems to have to be integrated in to the pack. Unless, of course, the BMW an LG designs intend to forego cold temperature thermal management.
The roadster pack has shown exceptional performance from an energy retention standpoint. The Model S appears to do at least as well, if not better. The other players really don't have much of a track record yet, so calling Tesla's proven design a kludge seems a bit much, no?
You disagree with the article? It seems reasoned enough.All hype, no facts.
In principle, this seems great. In reality, the design is simply insufficient to keep the battery anywhere near optimum temps. In colder climate, the range is reduced by 1/4 or 1/3 even above freezing conditions.The dual-loop design also allows waste heat from the drive unit or the pack heaters to use the same plumbing to also warm the batteries in cold weather, avoiding separate systems to have to be integrated in to the pack. Unless, of course, the BMW an LG designs intend to forego cold temperature thermal management.
Is that the BMS or Climate Control?In principle, this seems great. In reality, the design is simply insufficient to keep the battery anywhere near optimum temps. In colder climate, the range is reduced by 1/4 or 1/3 even above freezing conditions.
So do many of the battery of the week articles, so far none have amounted to anything.You disagree with the article? It seems reasoned enough.
Where do you think the energy to keep the battery warm comes from? Hint: it's the battery itself. That will eat the range.In principle, this seems great. In reality, the design is simply insufficient to keep the battery anywhere near optimum temps. In colder climate, the range is reduced by 1/4 or 1/3 even above freezing conditions.
Has nothing to do with battery of the week. It's talking about actually deployed systems which are considered state of the art. Tesla may very well follow BMW's lead and change to DX.So do many of the battery of the week articles, so far none have amounted to anything.
Yes it eats the range, and eats more range due to heat loss. It's all part of the design.Where do you think the energy to keep the battery warm comes from? Hint: it's the battery itself. That will eat the range.
Your post ignores important discussion context: namely the thermal management system reduces battery degradation and allows higher performance. This is the case even in cold weather.Yes it eats the range, and eats more range due to heat loss. It's all part of the design.
I wonder what kind of solution the Model 3 will have at its price point. I can't imagine it will have all of the tech from the S, and I am curious if one area of cost savings is in the cooling/heating of the battery.
If they cheap out on thermal management, I and I believe many others will cancel their orders.
There is not a scenario I can foresee where Musk will make this blunder.
I also have a fear that the autopilot will not be the latest generation as hoped, but most likely what is currently available on the Model S, and possibly even limited in some way as to not truly compete with the S / X.
They're good at engineering. I'm sure that if they went without it, they would have solid reasoning and have been testing it in simulations for a while already. I'm not concerned. They have to pay the warranty costs if they're wrong, so their own financials are on the line along with reputation.If they cheap out on thermal management, I and I believe many others will cancel their orders.
There is not a scenario I can foresee where Musk will make this blunder.
They're good at engineering. I'm sure that if they went without it, they would have solid reasoning and have been testing it in simulations for a while already. I'm not concerned. They have to pay the warranty costs if they're wrong, so their own financials are on the line along with reputation.
I'm curious to see what their HVAC solution will be for the car's cabin. They haven't provided any details on it.
Does anyone have any clue how much heat is generated during charging?during charging though as that generates a lot of heat.
The LEAF's passive cooling .....