You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
"81.5% of US counties are in the high or substantial transmission category."
To be honest, I don't know what to think about 'herd immunity' because of the seemingly regular reinfections."81.5% of US counties are in the high or substantial transmission category."
Three weeks ago it was already 73.2%. Yet deaths continue to decline. Hospitalizations have doubled since the low in April, but ICU load is not growing nearly as fast. Herd immunity is increasing and treatments are improving. We're not at "just a flu" levels yet, but we're getting close.
To be honest, I don't know what to think about 'herd immunity' because of the seemingly regular reinfections.
It is not like the potential of getting the flu each year because of Long Covid's serious issues.
What am I missing about this old notion of 'herd immunity' that doesn't really seem to apply "anymore".
Likely my perception or interpretation is off.
I have a long road trip this summer with a well vaccinated (2nd booster after 4+ months from prev) auto-immune person.
Thinking of contingency if one of us gets covid while we are traveling. Kind of weird but there is a treatment aspect plus all the night lodging is preplanned and prepaid for (with typical cancelation notice).
Yet deaths continue to decline.
I’m like 70% sure at this point that I am wrong about that. I just have no idea why.
My wife told me that a lot of the patients she is seeing in the hospital are COVID+ even though most have been vaccinated. But a number of those are not in the hospital because of COVID but something else. They just are testing anyone who has any symptoms. Still have to treat them as COVID precautions patients though.Yes. It sucks that COVID is still around, but if we can keep driving deaths down, we should take the win, and hope that long COVID is not actually really very common when boosted (still TBD, but seems possible). It definitely sucks for those who are immunocompromised, at this point.
I guess I should have stuck to my long tail theory. I guess it was right and what is happening is roughly predictable from ICU numbers plus a long death tail.
We're at 3000 ICU right now compared to about 4000 at the prior minimum of ~240 deaths per day (with some smoothing). Given the relatively early occurrence of deaths after ICU entry, I guess I wouldn't expect us to drop much more below our current ~300 a day level (even though one might directly extrapolate to below 200, I don't think we can get below 250 in the near term, since ICU numbers are rising). But it's complicated; have to think about the delays and the ultimate lower limit also depends on how long ICU numbers have been low, as well as the current trajectory. I'm surprised someone hasn't come up with impulse responses to each signal and convolved them to predict deaths.
In any case that's still ~3-4% excess mortality! Hopefully we can get it even lower, to 100 a day. Someday! Maybe at the end of the summer after the BA.4/BA.5 wave, which should end in August/September timeframe. Or maybe it will require a retargeted vaccine and a bit of luck with stability from the virus for a bit.
Delta and Omicron killed far more children than flu ever does.
Covid-19 killed around 600 children in 2021, which is far more than influenza ever kills in any given year. At the peak of Omicron, 156 US children died of Covid-19 in a single month (January 2022). In the 10 years leading up to the Covid-19 pandemic, an average of 120 children died of flu per year—and that was without masking or distancing.
Makes you wonder if China knows something we don't.And I wonder what the ratio of kids dead:kids with long covid is.
Meanwhile in China:
China Plans for Years of Covid Zero Strategy With Tests on Every Corner
After a bruising lockdown in Shanghai and severe curbs in Beijing were needed to halt the spread of Covid-19, China is doubling down on mass-testing in a move that’s dashing hopes for a shift away from its costly Covid Zero strategy.www.bloomberg.comChina Plans for Years of Covid Zero Strategy With Tests on Every Corner
- Cities require frequent Covid tests to detect stealthy spread
- Permanent testing infrastructure may solidify zero tolerance
What will be the long term effects of this? Will we get less frequent influenza seasons as influensa used to start in China a lot of the time? Will China be isolating people with colds, influenza and other diseases and Chinese kids have worse immune systems? When a Chinese person travels abroad he can expect some nasty weeks while his immune system catches up to everything going around in the west?
Will we have a Europeans and native americans situation again?
I think people were too quick with calling their strategy stupid/insane/crazy. I will admit that I was. Whenever someone knows what you do and still chooses to do something different the first response should not be that they are stupid, but instead to try to understand why, if there are pros with their choice etc, can they make workarounds around the cons that you see etc.Makes you wonder if China knows something we don't.
The problem with the zero tolerance policy is political. There's no way to enforce it in most countries, so there isn't a lot of point in pursuing it. There's also the issue of untrained immune systems, and the vaccine-not-developed-here issue that China has. What's required is a faster vaccine ramp so a vaccine appears shortly after the next variant.I think people were too quick with calling their strategy stupid/insane/crazy. I will admit that I was. Whenever someone knows what you do and still chooses to do something different the first response should not be that they are stupid, but instead to try to understand why, if there are pros with their choice etc, can they make workarounds around the cons that you see etc.
Does that include all the ones that were removed in march or have they taken that into consideration?Delta and Omicron killed far more children than flu ever does.
Covid-19 killed around 600 children in 2021, which is far more than influenza ever kills in any given year. At the peak of Omicron, 156 US children died of Covid-19 in a single month (January 2022). In the 10 years leading up to the Covid-19 pandemic, an average of 120 children died of flu per year—and that was without masking or distancing.
I think you are right as far as the deaths in children and adolescents. Fortunately it is much lower than the death rates for adults.Does that include all the ones that were removed in march or have they taken that into consideration?
Covid-19: US tracker overestimated deaths among children
The US’s health protection agency has reduced the number of deaths it is attributing to covid-19 by more than 70 000 after what it referred to as “coding logic errors” were highlighted on social media. On 15 March the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) removed 72 277 deaths...www.bmj.com
I am not trying to minimize the risk of COVID to kids I just want to make sure the data are accurate. I suspect it is not more dangerous to kids on an infection by infection basis than the flu, it is just much more contagious than the flu at this point during the pandemic so there are a lot more infections which lead to a higher number of deaths. I have a vaccinated elementary age child and them dying of COVID is not a concern for me honestly.
You are fortunate that your kids are old enough because there are a lot of worried parents of unvaccinated younger kids.I have a vaccinated elementary age child and them dying of COVID is not a concern for me honestly.
It’s certainly good to have the option if it is shown to help. That said, there have been 900 COVID deaths for kids age 0-17 in the last 2 years out of 73 million kids in that age group. I’m not gonna lose my mind over those odds but I get that some worry more than others.You are fortunate that your kids are old enough because there are a lot of worried parents of unvaccinated younger kids.
I think the right policy would have been "zero covid" until most people were vaccinated. Like with New Zealand. That definitely reduced severe disease numbers by orders of magnitude.The problem with the zero tolerance policy is political. There's no way to enforce it in most countries, so there isn't a lot of point in pursuing it. There's also the issue of untrained immune systems, and the vaccine-not-developed-here issue that China has. What's required is a faster vaccine ramp so a vaccine appears shortly after the next variant.
Agreed, provided mask=N95 Cloth masks are 80% useless.I think the right policy would have been "zero covid" until most people were vaccinated. Like with New Zealand. That definitely reduced severe disease numbers by orders of magnitude.
I think the right strategy now would be simple mask mandate to reduce transmission.