AnxietyRanger
Well-Known Member
Find me one single example of a critical experience drawing a dozen go away short messages. One.
Perhaps this?
Delay in model X launch?
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Find me one single example of a critical experience drawing a dozen go away short messages. One.
Having said all that, I agree that new posters with problems/issues should be given the benefit of the doubt.
It is where we disagree. I believe the bulk of participants in this thread are talking about politeness or at least communication effectiveness. There are few (one, two?) who seem to believe it's more about anti-Tesla (or pro-Tesla) bias. I've given an example of @wk057's thread where he changed the tone and the thread became productive and civil. This in stark comparison to his threads that devolved into name-calling and finger pointing.I guess this is where we disagree. I do not believe it is about communicating with respect alone. The same amount of respect or lack thereof produces different results based on the opinions and biases involved.
It is only human.
Ok. I counted 3 people who said short, not a dozen, but I could only stomach browsing the first 100 posts. Many people, including you, found the OPs method and sudden appearance fishy though. Though OPs posts all deleted, I recall that OP was not forthcoming with tangible support for claim, which did not help.
No, it's not your communication, it's that they just.WONT.LISTENImagine I repost that example hundreds of times, anytime someone mentions something about how tone doesn't matter. Always as the same example to try to prove my point. How would that play out? I can tell you this - it would make me feel like a terribly ineffective communicator at a minimum.
No, it's not your communication, it's that they just.WONT.LISTEN
Ok. I counted 3 people who said short, not a dozen, but I could only stomach browsing the first 100 posts. Many people, including you, found the OPs method and sudden appearance fishy though. Though OPs posts all deleted, I recall that OP was not forthcoming with tangible support for claim, which did not help.
It is where we disagree. I believe the bulk of participants in this thread are talking about politeness or at least communication effectiveness. There are few (one, two?) who seem to believe it's more about anti-Tesla (or pro-Tesla) bias. I've given an example of @wk057's thread where he changed the tone and the thread became productive and civil. This in stark comparison to his threads that devolved into name-calling and finger pointing.
Imagine I repost that example hundreds of times, anytime someone mentions something about how tone doesn't matter. Always as the same example to try to prove my point. How would that play out? I can tell you this - it would make me feel like a terribly ineffective communicator at a minimum.
A thread with these claims would have been laughed at 3 years ago, the op would have been ran out of town as a "short"...
Good afternoon everyone... TMC is working on the issue... Brian Applegate is handling the investigation... It was handed over to him by Jon McNeil... Like I said I love my car and TMC... And would hate to see them damaged in any way by this unfortunate situation or "Employee.."
And for you "HATERS AND DOUBTERS... This is a "VERY TRUE UNFORTUNATE SITUATION" You haters out there who think I am a TROLL and not REAL should be ashamed of yourself... It's you who distorts the TRUTH... I certainly hope nothing like this ever happens to you... But as RUDE as a COUPLE of you are... it certainly would teach you a lesson... But I doubt it.. it was all in your upbringing... Don't you remember your parents saying... if you don't have anything good to say... don't say anything at all...
I apologize if I have offended anyone by sharing my story and the "TRUTH"
Without a doubt my car will never return to CSC. for anything...
Sincerely Joe Rinke...
Calling people "shorts" is uncivil behavior. So is interrupting a conversation with a complaint that's been well aired. You said you disagree with me (verbally and by voting) that this conversation is about tone, but I still don't see how it isn't. Either side can be uncivil. Perhaps you think that everyone's OK with short-calling and troll-calling. Allow me to set the record straight on that - I am absolutely as turned off by that as I am by the opposite.@ohmman I guess we are talking a bit past each other, about two different things. I'm not saying the tone doesn't matter ever. No, no, no... I agree it matters to an extent.
So harder, more difficult points aren't so easy to discuss? I don't believe that's unique to TMC, online forums, or life. That's why we avoid politics and religion in casual conversation. I can't imagine you're suggesting that discussing hard things should be just as easy as discussing easy things.Try to discuss a harder topic, try to argue a more difficult point, be an unknown poster (no history) etc., things are not so easy.
Perhaps you think that everyone's OK with short-calling and troll-calling. Allow me to set the record straight on that - I am absolutely as turned off by that as I am by by the opposite.
So harder, more difficult points aren't so easy to discuss? I don't believe that's unique to TMC, online forums, or life. That's why we avoid politics and religion in casual conversation. I can't imagine you're suggesting that discussing hard things should be just as easy as discussing easy things.
Both sides (or many sides) of this debate have people grouping up, joining together thinking the same. Why doesn't the other side get it - we here get it. It isn't our communication, the other side just isn't getting it. Then get the usual names pressing Like, Love, Helpful to each other and most often not to the other side.
And this tit-for-tat continues...
It is only human, as said. Nobody is perfect, this is just the way it goes.
If you feel frustrated by it, rest assured someone is equally frustrated by you not getting it.
That was a joke, sir. For the record I agree That @ohmman should not repeat himself over and over, nor should you or I. I will also note that 18 of the last 50 posts in this thread are yours, so maybe all 3 of us ought to stand back a while and see what others have to say.
Well, the first step is not to declare 'fraud' at the beginning (or ever) of the conversation. Simply express what the problem is: "On xxx day, Tesla said '.....' (reference), and to date I have not seen evidence that that has actually occurred. Did I miss something, cause it is upsetting me. " The word 'fraud' is a very serious accusation with legal implications for the addressee and the one making the allegation. Best avoided. If one really thinks there is fraud, then they should be approaching the authorities.What if you really feel that Tesla committed a fraud, for example. (I'm not saying I think so, just as an example.) How do you put that out there without offending someone really seriously? It is not very easy. One might be tempted to not express their real opinion, if they are trying to be civil and not offend anyone. It is easy being civil, when the topic is easy or you are on the side of the majority opinion. Try to discuss a harder topic, try to argue a more difficult point, be an unknown poster (no history) etc., things are not so easy.
Well, the first step is not to declare 'fraud' at the beginning (or ever) of the conversation. Simply express what the problem is: "On xxx day, Tesla said '.....' (reference), and to date I have not seen evidence that that has actually occurred. Did I miss something, cause it is upsetting me. " The word 'fraud' is a very serious accusation with legal implications for the addressee and the one making the allegation. Best avoided. If one really thinks there is fraud, then they should be approaching the authorities.
Ok. Perfect test case. Here's a new thread started Wednesday. First post by new member. Spectacular story. Hard to get all the facts. All the suspicious earmarks. But in 2 pages and 32 posts, no "short" accusations, just members trying to help. I really do not think members are as nasty as @AnxietyRanger suggests.