LosAltosChuck
Member
If I’m in San Diego with my Tesla (not an unreasonable possibility), and I’m at a public charger OR a Supercharger, it is because I drove down from the Bay Area and I need charging. I won’t be near my home to charge. While I land on the side of folks who say that the Leaf folks have no grounds to complain about public charger use (except for the parking spot hogs we all hate), I also respectfully disagree with dreamwave6 on using Superchargers as the primary mechanism for charging, and treating home charging as “emergency only” charging. Two reasons this is bad, in my opinion: the Supercharger network is designed to extend range nationally, not to merely be an energy subsidy. For those of us who are early adopters, buying the more expensive Model S and X vehicles, we were incentivized to take that step by being offered a nationwide range for free. It is not expected that people would go beyond their local range on a regular basis, in fact, I think most driving happens within about 20 miles of home for the average person. If Tesla had intended this to be just an energy subsidy, they could have saved money by just paying our home electric bills. The Supercharger network can’t support all of us (or even many of us) using it as our every day charger.
Second reason it is bad is that the Tesla batteries, as I understand it, are not designed to be supercharged every time. As I understand it, these batteries benefit from a slower charge.
Second reason it is bad is that the Tesla batteries, as I understand it, are not designed to be supercharged every time. As I understand it, these batteries benefit from a slower charge.