I think what rxlawdude was saying is that fixing a problem in of itself cannot be used against a company in a lawsuit. Case in point: the tragedy with the alligator at Disney World. Disney erected a wall around the lake after the incident. The fact that they erected a fence afterwards in of itself does not prove that they were liable. Everything else that the did or did not do prior is a whole other matter.
-
Want to remove ads? Register an account and login to see fewer ads, and become a Supporting Member to remove almost all ads.
No, but the negligence was not building the fence and warning signs in the first place as the other resorts did. So all you have to do is prove that they knew or should have known of the danger and building the fence was a reaction to prevnt further accidents. Then it's not "in and of itself" anymore as other facts are introduced. We are probably getting to far into the weeds as we both know Disney will settle for a fortune no matter what. Tesla, on the other hand, just needs to be careful in how they communicate safety fixes.
RogerHScott
Active Member
Awww, c'mon! I was hoping for tort law citations, appeals to English Common Law, etc.
Nikki's Dad
Member
I can't wait for 8.0 to come out so we can talk about sometime more interesting....
From the Federal Rules of Evidence:
Rule 407. Subsequent Remedial Measures
When measures are taken that would have made an earlier injury or harm less likely to occur, evidence of the subsequent measures is not admissible to prove:
From the Federal Rules of Evidence:
Rule 407. Subsequent Remedial Measures
When measures are taken that would have made an earlier injury or harm less likely to occur, evidence of the subsequent measures is not admissible to prove:
- negligence;
- culpable conduct;
- a defect in a product or its design; or
- a need for a warning or instruction.
It's here. 1hr 40m to install. Have to wait till the weekend, assuming that is possible, to apply the update though. Tried to find release notes on Tesla website but no go.
Anyone applied the update? What did you find the best and worst part of the update?
Anyone applied the update? What did you find the best and worst part of the update?
CuriousG
Active Member
They're still rolling out 2.36.31. Even ev-fw.com has 64 installs as of today so I doubt it's 8.0.
That's likely just 2.36.31, which has a security fix that's being pushed out to all vehicles.
pjw65
Member
It will be 7.1 2.36.31, it is widely spread all over the world since yesterday.
Except on my car, it's still on 2.32.100.
Except on my car, it's still on 2.32.100.
Ok great, I'm convinced. There's absolutely no reason we can't have release notes. Hell, even @RogerHScott wants them
.
rxlawdude
Active Member
Thanks for posting. It's just as I remember it in law school. Guess I wasn't snoozing that day.
Lex
Member
Let's also not forget that they've already put some major "improvements" in writing in some of the bigger releases.
But Legal Dept. suggesting "minor improvements and bug fixes" is as good a reason as any.
But Legal Dept. suggesting "minor improvements and bug fixes" is as good a reason as any.
This is the third thread I see being posted before confirming it's 8.0.
HankLloydRight
No Roads
SMSMD
Active Member
I was on a look out for comments on this update since morning. Ignored this particular thread thinking it's the same old thread for 8.0.
I think the moderator or the OP should change the title as it's misleading.
ArtInCT
Always Learning
Similar threads
