bedoig
Member
Loser. I'm at 287. You're charging it wrong.we didn’t get anything. This is Tesla playing with the numbers.
My 1 year old AWD shows 281 on a full charge.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Loser. I'm at 287. You're charging it wrong.we didn’t get anything. This is Tesla playing with the numbers.
My 1 year old AWD shows 281 on a full charge.
The AWD Model 3 is perfectly capable to be modified in Performance. That’s mostly a software throttle on the front motor to appears less quicker than the Performance version.
I assume the measurements are pre-2019-36.1 (5% boost).
AWD does 0-60 in roughly 4 flat with the 1 foot roll-out. I think this boost may get us to 3.9 but we will see. 3.9 is BMW M3 territory BTW.Does anyone know what 0-60 time the AWD non performance would be after the upcoming 5% power boost ?
I’m a little confused because we received a power boost a while back, that brought the AWD 0-60 close to 4.1 seconds ( If I recall that correctly ).
So is this 5% more ?
Would that bring us into the high 3’s. ?
to...?
So who is it?Converting an AWD to Performance maybe? That username looks familiar...
No he just means putting the 20" wheels and performance tires on his AWD.So who is it?
Noticed the following on page 179 of the latest owners manual. It seems really strange to me that the RWD can handle a higher maximum current than the non-performance AWD. I knew that there's speculation that the performance may have a different rear motor, but I always thought that the RWD and non-performance AWD had the same rear motor. This really implies to me that they're artificially limiting the AWD. Am I mistaken in my interpretation of this?
View attachment 474652
The speculation was always RWD and Perf having the same inverter whereas the Dual motor has a different one. It was based off of the EPA specs back in the day.Noticed the following on page 179 of the latest owners manual. It seems really strange to me that the RWD can handle a higher maximum current than the non-performance AWD. I knew that there's speculation that the performance may have a different rear motor, but I always thought that the RWD and non-performance AWD had the same rear motor. This really implies to me that they're artificially limiting the AWD. Am I mistaken in my interpretation of this?
View attachment 474652
Noticed the following on page 179 of the latest owners manual. It seems really strange to me that the RWD can handle a higher maximum current than the non-performance AWD. I knew that there's speculation that the performance may have a different rear motor, but I always thought that the RWD and non-performance AWD had the same rear motor. This really implies to me that they're artificially limiting the AWD. Am I mistaken in my interpretation of this?
View attachment 474652
im sure they are artifically limiting lots of things including that the P and RWD should be significantly faster.