JohnSnowNW
Active Member
I don't know, that leg room seems pretty tight...for an "SUV."
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I don't know, that leg room seems pretty tight...for an "SUV."
I would consider it a CUV not an SUV by its dimensions.
NEW ALL-ELECTRIC JAGUAR I-PACE $69,500.00
I-PACE SEV400 BASE
CONFIGURED OPTIONS TOTAL
$4,085.00
Delivery and Destination Charge
$995.00
$74,580.00
GRAND TOTAL
DETAILED SUMMARY
YOUR BUILD
EXTERIOR $0.00
Fuji White $0.00
18" 15 spoke 'Style 1022' $0.00
Fixed panoramic roof $ 0.00
Privacy glass $ 0.00
Chrome side window surround $ 0.00
LED headlights $ 0.00
INTERIOR $725.00
Ebony Luxtec sport seats with Ebony/Ebony interior $ 0.00
10-way electric memory front seats $725.00
Light Oyster Morzine headlining $ 0.00
Gloss Black trim finisher $ 0.00
Soft grain leather sport steering wheel $ 0.00
Meridian™ Sound System $ 0.00
OPTIONS $3,360.00
Driver Assist Pack $3,000.00
Auto-dimming, power fold, heated door mirrors with memory and approach lights $360.00
360° Surround Camera $ 0.00
And considering the ground clearance is effectively the same & the frunk is larger in the M3, it is correct to compare these 2 vehicles (M3 AWD) than the MS or MXModel 3 has 10 mm more headroom in front (same difference with/without glass roof for both)
Model 3 has 4 mm less headroom on 2nd row (or 11 mm less when I-Pace has glass roof).
Model 3 has 44 mm more legroom in front and 4 mm more legroom 2nd row.
Model 3 has 2,3 cubic feet less cargo (with seats up).
Lazy mode: an inch is 25,4 mm
So for people in front seats, the Model 3 is more spacious, but in the back it is very similar to the I-Pace.
I actually want value for money, which the iPace clearly isn’tJaguar have something the Teslas all lack, actual leather on the seats. Which is insane that it is lacking from a car that price.
I can see the I-Pace appeal to the people who wants a luxury car that is electric, while the Teslas will appeal to us that want a more thechy car. I can forego actually nice materials for the nice screen, some people can't.
I actually want value for money, which the iPace clearly isn’t
And badge is now irrelevant, as Tesla has become a more desirable car (independent research on ‘coolness’)
It would be interesting to compare 10 cost of ownership of an M3 to a Toyota Camry
Price in relation to: driving range, safety (including autonomous features), charging network, acceleration, road handling & driver seat comfort.So dependant on what you value the i-Pace could be good or bad value, same as the Teslas.
That said, build quality so far seems to be a clear issue on the M3. The fault rate is far too high.Price in relation to: driving range, safety (including autonomous features), charging network, acceleration, road handling & driver seat comfort.
In this regards, an AWD M3 w/SAS eclipses the iPace significantly (& may even be available prior)
Surely the I-Pace has DC-Fast charging or at least Chademo. Then it could use the new EA charger routes eg SeaTac > SLC which does exist today. Jag's webpage offers no info on 'how to charge your I-Pace' which is weird.
--
I would not feel guilty owning TSLA shares. Invest in what you feel will will make you money.Just now I am seriously considering buying an I-Pace in Rio de Janeiro because there is zero outlook for Model 3 to arrive here anytime soon.I am dithering a bit because I really wanted another Model 3. However I need to replace my ancient BMW and the I-Pace is available.
Admittedly there are gaps in charging infrastructure but even L1 overnight at hotels etc will be adequate given the mild weather here and new CCS and J1772 are cropping up every day, and there are ice ones in all three of my preferred shopping centers so I'll be able to avoid using too much of my own electricity.
I feel a bit guilty as a TSLA shareholder to buy an I-Pace. OTOH, how else can one attach three different national flags to a car with clear justification. After all, the company is Indian owned, the car is built in Austria by a Canadian company and the brand is based in England.
Am I about to make a mistake?
FWIW, we have in Brasil the Zoe, the Leaf. the Bolt is arriving now and we have also the JAC iEV20 and iEV40 plus the Chery Arizo 5e arriving soon. None of those appeals to me too much although the JAC iEV40 comes close. Were I rational the Zoe would win, probably. It's a blast to drive and is a great city car. The Leaf and Bolt are both too boring for me although the Bolt certainly meets the transportation requirements.I would not feel guilty owning TSLA shares. Invest in what you feel will will make you money.
Only you would know what is going to work in your country and provide you the best transportation options as well. There are vehicles that are working great in UK and not even available here in the US. The Renault Zoe comes to mind.
From what I heard, it's a bit unfinished product, a bit like 2012 Model S. Both software and hardware. May turn out to be poor financial decision, as values could crash down, if this generation is 'known bad'.Just now I am seriously considering buying an I-Pace in Rio de Janeiro because there is zero outlook for Model 3 to arrive here anytime soon.I am dithering a bit because I really wanted another Model 3. However I need to replace my ancient BMW and the I-Pace is available.
Admittedly there are gaps in charging infrastructure but even L1 overnight at hotels etc will be adequate given the mild weather here and new CCS and J1772 are cropping up every day, and there are ice ones in all three of my preferred shopping centers so I'll be able to avoid using too much of my own electricity.
I feel a bit guilty as a TSLA shareholder to buy an I-Pace. OTOH, how else can one attach three different national flags to a car with clear justification. After all, the company is Indian owned, the car is built in Austria by a Canadian company and the brand is based in England.
Am I about to make a mistake?
From what I heard, it's a bit unfinished product, a bit like 2012 Model S. Both software and hardware. May turn out to be poor financial decision, as values could crash down, if this generation is 'known bad'.