HankLloydRight
No Roads
The difference is that 'hidden' cars are all cars that Tesla listed, available for sale, publically. There are also only six listed and all of them are CPOs from 2013 or 2014 and have significant mileage. So in this case, we know that Tesla's full intention was to list and sell these cars.
Your list on the other hand exposes hundreds of new cars, never published or indexed, and we don't know what Tesla's intention is for them to be available online as they are. I'm sure they weren't placed there to be exposed to the public without their knowledge or permission. And my major point is that forcing their hand to deal with over 500+ cars being published that they did not yet intend to publish can only lead to bad things for everyone else. I think it's an irresponsible position to take.
At a bare minimum, I would suggest not publishing your lists but rather telling people they are available from you by request.
In addition, I'd suggest going back and reading some TMC archives, where it's happened that "a couple of code jockeys posting on a fan forum" has actually moved the stock price based on complete speculation, after other "news" sites or blogs picked up rumors and posted them as facts. You might think posting here won't tell them anything they don't already know, but posting things like this can only help to support their analyses with what will be interpreted as "facts" by people outside of TMC.
Finally, I just don't see any benefit of posting this information online without permission from Tesla, unless your objective is to say 'fu Tesla... look what I did!". And before you say that I'm doing the same things, which I clearly do not think I'm doing, I have had many conversations with the North America Remarketing Manager (head of the CPO program) who knows full well what I'm doing and actually wanted to hire me to bring many of the features of EV-CPO to their CPO platform (which "later died in committee"--long story). I also keep him up to date with any enhancements or data issues with their stream, or other inconsistencies. So if he had a problem with what I'm doing, now over 1 1/2 years, I'd think he would have told me.
Your list on the other hand exposes hundreds of new cars, never published or indexed, and we don't know what Tesla's intention is for them to be available online as they are. I'm sure they weren't placed there to be exposed to the public without their knowledge or permission. And my major point is that forcing their hand to deal with over 500+ cars being published that they did not yet intend to publish can only lead to bad things for everyone else. I think it's an irresponsible position to take.
At a bare minimum, I would suggest not publishing your lists but rather telling people they are available from you by request.
In addition, I'd suggest going back and reading some TMC archives, where it's happened that "a couple of code jockeys posting on a fan forum" has actually moved the stock price based on complete speculation, after other "news" sites or blogs picked up rumors and posted them as facts. You might think posting here won't tell them anything they don't already know, but posting things like this can only help to support their analyses with what will be interpreted as "facts" by people outside of TMC.
Finally, I just don't see any benefit of posting this information online without permission from Tesla, unless your objective is to say 'fu Tesla... look what I did!". And before you say that I'm doing the same things, which I clearly do not think I'm doing, I have had many conversations with the North America Remarketing Manager (head of the CPO program) who knows full well what I'm doing and actually wanted to hire me to bring many of the features of EV-CPO to their CPO platform (which "later died in committee"--long story). I also keep him up to date with any enhancements or data issues with their stream, or other inconsistencies. So if he had a problem with what I'm doing, now over 1 1/2 years, I'd think he would have told me.