Welcome to Tesla Motors Club
Discuss Tesla's Model S, Model 3, Model X, Model Y, Cybertruck, Roadster and More.
Register

Model 3 Charging cost? - Significant increase in Electric bill

This site may earn commission on affiliate links.
I had this commute with this car and the running engine to heat the car would easily equate to 20 mpg (or less) for this ride

Yes that also makes sense. I also have a volt (wife has bolt, i have volt....getting a model 3 because i can use the extra range, plus volt/bolt are too similar in name :) )....I mentioned the Volt because on a 7 mile commute you would never need the gas engine. That would be there for longer trips only. On my volt I have 50k km, of which about 5k are on the engine and 45k on EV.

Back on point: an ICE car under these 7 mile commutes is horribly inefficient, because they will run 'rich' until the engine heats up. Before the bolt my wife had a TDI golf, which got close to 60mpg on the highway when warm, but about 16mpg when cold and on short commutes...a big factor why we got her a bolt since she does a mix of short and long trips and the bolt is a similar size to the golf (and the m3 wasn't out yet).

In an apples to apples comparison an EV still wins hands down. Let's do a more fair comparison of 20mpg/7 mile commute for regular gas vs an EV with typical heat use...

ICE under these conditions:

7/20 = 0.35 gal @ 1.30/L (avg price of regular where I live), that gives a cost of $1.72 for a 7 mile commute, or $0.25/mile

EV under these conditions (assuming 50% of normal range, which is extreme and only valid for this use case):

Model 3 rated for 500km/75kwh x 0.5 ~ 250km/75kwh = 3.33 km/kwh, or 2.1 miles/kwh (that is horrible btw....)

At $0.13/kwh (typical cost where I live) that would mean the 7 mile commute would cost:

$0.43....or $0.062/mile....

That's still 4x less that an ICE, and things only get better as temperature warms up. ICE cars also get better as the temp rises and commutes get longer, but in that case an EV will still be upwards of 100mpg 'equivalent'
 
Last edited:
Yes that also makes sense. I also have a volt (wife has bolt, i have volt....getting a model 3 because i can use the extra range, plus volt/bolt are too similar in name :) )....I mentioned the Volt because on a 7 mile commute you would never need the gas engine. That would be there for longer trips only. On my volt I have 50k km, of which about 5k are on the engine and 45k on EV.

Back on point: an ICE car under these 7 mile commutes is horribly inefficient, because they will run 'rich' until the engine heats up. Before the bolt my wife had a TDI golf, which got close to 60mpg on the highway when warm, but about 16mpg when cold and on short commutes...a big factor why we got her a bolt since she does a mix of short and long trips and the bolt is a similar size to the golf (and the m3 wasn't out yet).

In an apples to apples comparison an EV still wins hands down. Let's do a more fair comparison of 20mpg/7 mile commute for regular gas vs an EV with typical heat use...

ICE under these conditions:

7/20 = 0.35 gal @ 1.30/L (avg price of regular where I live), that gives a cost of $1.72 for a 7 mile commute, or $0.25/mile

EV under these conditions (assuming 50% of normal range, which is extreme and only valid for this use case):

Model 3 rated for 500km/75kwh x 0.5 ~ 250km/75kwh = 3.33 km/kwh, or 2.1 miles/kwh (that is horrible btw....)

At $0.13/kwh (typical cost where I live) that would mean the 7 mile commute would cost:

$0.43....or $0.062/mile....

That's still 4x less that an ICE, and things only get better as temperature warms up. ICE cars also get better as the temp rises and commutes get longer, but in that case an EV will still be upwards of 100mpg 'equivalent'


None of this takes into account the loss factor. Also, charging in my experience seems much notm inefficient. On such a short committee in winter the cost of an ICE and the 3 is much closer it seems..
 
  • Like
  • Disagree
Reactions: VistaM3B and pcons
I believe Toronto has been much warmer this past July, based on the Cooling Degree Days calculation...

You might try something like TeslaFi.com to monitor the power consumption of the car. I've been pretty happy with it. The negative is that your giving someone else a token that can access your car. Use my username in the how did you hear about us and get 1 month instead of 2 weeks free trial.
 

Attachments

  • degree_days.pdf
    25.2 KB · Views: 65
I believe Toronto has been much warmer this past July, based on the Cooling Degree Days calculation...

You might try something like TeslaFi.com to monitor the power consumption of the car. I've been pretty happy with it. The negative is that your giving someone else a token that can access your car. Use my username in the how did you hear about us and get 1 month instead of 2 weeks free trial.


You might be right. I will definitely try that app. Thanks so much for the suggestion!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Amandeep
None of this takes into account the loss factor. Also, charging in my experience seems much notm inefficient. On such a short committee in winter the cost of an ICE and the 3 is much closer it seems..

Ok, so adjust my math by 20%, so cost goes from $0.062/mile to $0.074/mile, or for the 7 mile example, charging cost is $0.52 vs $1.72 for ICE at 20mpg...still waaaay below ICE under the same 7 mile drive conditions. No question about that.

In this extreme example we have assumed the worst case for an EV (7 mile commute in winter), and the math still shows you would need a 60mpg car to have it cost the same person mile...after driving EVs for the past 5 winters in Toronto I have full confidence an ICE costs nowhere near the same amount per km or mile as an EV.
 
I rated deadlast in terms of total energy consumption in the neighbourhood. But it doesn't matter as all charging is done after 12am and the rate is 2c/kwh. That's $1.7 for a full charge of 410km. Can't complain vs gas....
 
Do not have cabin overheat protection. My electricity rates are 0.065 cents / KW

18.24 * 0.065 = $1.19~

$1.19 * 31 days = $36.00

However my bill has gone up about $120 on average compared to the previous years during the same month. I mean there is some other charges such as delivery on top of the cost per KW but that is still quite a bit higher than it should be. I just cant make sense of it. Wondering if my HWPC is drawing much more than it should.....

In GTA power stream area, we signed up super saving plan. It costs me only 2 cents per kWh after 12AM, but they increased 5 cents on my peak rate. It works perfectly with an EV which charges at night.

This is an experiment plan, it suppose to be ended by next spring. Hopefully, this shall be the future electricity bill going.
 
In Michigan, my 240V home charger usage almost doubled from a month of 50 degree nights to a month of 30 degree nights. I suppose this is due to the plugged in Model 3 using power to keep the battery at a protective temperature??? I also do use about 30 miles of electricity per day driving instead of my usual 23 for driving with heat on now that it is cold. I also increased my max charge from 60 % to 80 % so that I won't get caught low on miles if I travel far in cold weather. Thus, it may take longer to charge for two reasons:
I use more miles daily
It takes longer to charge the closer you get to 100% charge???
 
On AC connection there is no charge tapering till well over 90%.
The battery is also not heated accept to charge when parked or when preheating the cabin via the app.

It is warming the battery before charging and the extra energy use when driving that is doing it.

I believe protective warming is not done till like -20f if atall.

Warming the battery to charge is a big deal though, it is a lot of mass you have to warm.
 
On AC connection there is no charge tapering till well over 90%.
The battery is also not heated accept to charge when parked or when preheating the cabin via the app.

It is warming the battery before charging and the extra energy use when driving that is doing it.

I believe protective warming is not done till like -20f if atall.

Warming the battery to charge is a big deal though, it is a lot of mass you have to warm.


Thanks for all that info. but I have one question:
Then why should I plug the car in every night if the battery is not conditioned regularly?
 
Thanks for all that info. but I have one question:
Then why should I plug the car in every night if the battery is not conditioned regularly?

If that's true about heating the battery, then one benefit left is if you preheat in the morning the power comes off the line, and not from the battery. Other than that I don't know.

Edit: Also I think I read that preheat with the car plugged in does heat the battery.
 
If that's true about heating the battery, then one benefit left is if you preheat in the morning the power comes off the line, and not from the battery. Other than that I don't know.

Edit: Also I think I read that preheat with the car plugged in does heat the battery.
Good point, but the car warms up quickly without preheat so far this season, so I don't preheat.
Thus, from what I've learned today, I am going to charge to 80% (instead of just 60%) and only plug in 3 nights per week. That should cut the electric bill down quite a bit!
 
Good point, but the car warms up quickly without preheat so far this season, so I don't preheat.
Thus, from what I've learned today, I am going to charge to 80% (instead of just 60%) and only plug in 3 nights per week. That should cut the electric bill down quite a bit!

I won't matter if you plug in 3 nights a week, or every night, your electric bill isn't going to change. If your driving habits are the same, you're going to have the same consumption and therefore require the same amount of charging. You're either charging a little bit every day or charging for longer on the 3 nights a week that you plug in.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MorrisonHiker
Thus, from what I've learned today, I am going to charge to 80% (instead of just 60%) and only plug in 3 nights per week. That should cut the electric bill down quite a bit!

That shouldn't make any difference in your electric bill. Just being plugged in won't use any electricity.

Though it is possible that a longer charge might have the battery heating turned on for less time than multiple smaller charges. So it is possible you might be able to save a little bit of energy.
 
That shouldn't make any difference in your electric bill. Just being plugged in won't use any electricity.
True, but not having to warm the battery on these cold nights in the 20 degrees F before charging each of 7 nights per week (and only doing so 3 nights per week) will cut down on the time that ions are flowing - I would think.

For example, if it takes one hour to warm up the battery before charging, I will be cutting out 4 hours.
 
True, but not having to warm the battery on these cold nights in the 20 degrees F before charging each of 7 nights per week (and only doing so 3 nights per week) will cut down on the time that ions are flowing - I would think.

It all depends on if the battery gets up to temperature before the charge completes or not. So charging as soon as you get back so the battery is already warm would likely reduce your energy usage.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VistaM3B
The charging soon as you get home may be a good strategy if you are ok with no regen and reduced power at the start of your drive.
The battery is going to get much colder going days between charging and it will impact the driving experience more than you are seeing now. You may find yourself going back to daily charging as winter gets colder.

Last winter I had a lower capacity charging solution and timed charging did not work well temp and variable use meant I was never on target.
This year I have a HCWC and charge my S at 60amps, most mornings this means zero Regen limiting. I do not watch my bill closely though so no idea if it helps or hurts
 
  • Like
Reactions: TesSpartan