You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I am a bit confused here. I have always considered that HVAC loads are continuous since they are on for 3 or more hours at a time.However great it may have been it does not meet the standard for a "continuous load" defined by the NEC. I think that is all the other posters were suggesting.
Huh. That's an interesting question. It seems they generally are considered continuous loads, but because that is known, the equipment documentation always has a value on it called MCA (minimum circuit amps) that already has the 125% capacity built into it.I am a bit confused here. I have always considered that HVAC loads are continuous since they are on for 3 or more hours at a time.
Can you quote the NEC section you are referring to which says they are not continuous?
I wasn't referring to a code section. I am sure it is considered continuous.Can you quote the NEC section you are referring to which says they are not continuous?
Especially recent combination fan motor compressor HVAC of the residential size this is true. Older and larger units did not have this labeling.Huh. That's an interesting question. It seems they generally are considered continuous loads, but because that is known, the equipment documentation always has a value on it called MCA (minimum circuit amps) that already has the 125% capacity built into it.
HVAC Design Load
if the MCA is used to determine the actual load of the HVAC, in this case the MCA 38 amps, a 40 amp breaker will not suffice, unless i am missing something here. The MCA figure already includes the 125% of largest motor safety factor. Also the motors are very unlikely to draw their FLA. Thus...forums.mikeholt.com
But AC units cycle on and off, they don't run for hours straight at max current draw. Larger units are also usually hard-wired.
However great it may have been it does not meet the standard for a "continuous load" defined by the NEC. I think that is all the other posters were suggesting.
Yeah, I've come to the conclusion that it is a better example than I thought. Sorry, @pepperoni .Maybe not in California… but in Texas and arazona and the entire SE they are. They are considered a continuous load.
Yes, both have the same 50amps, the difference is 6-50 does not have a neutral wire. Tesla does not need a neutral.I'm looking at a new house with 14-50 already wired to a separate meter. We have 6-50 currently, according to the telsa site it charges at the same rate.
It’s not rocket science but here is definitely a fair amount of knowledge involved. That’s what you pay an electrician for - their knowledge and experience. I won’t say that a homeowner can’t wire an EV outlet safely but I would never say that the ‘average homeowner’ can do it safely, either.Simple outlet, re-installing an outlet? Yes.
Wiring/installing a NEW 240V, 50-60amp outlet, that is energized for 4-5-6 hours, every day?
I strongly disagree. Your post is dangerous advice to anyone "with a little experience."
I agree. I was unaware that GFCI breakers were required or available until I read some posts here. I just ordered one to bring my earlier install into compliance. Also another piece of advice was to hardwire a Wall Connector at another location because the cost was similar to that of a mobile connector plus GFCI breaker and high end 14-50 receptacle.It’s not rocket science but here is definitely a fair amount of knowledge involved
Good to know. I use ferrules with stranded wire and the Leviton receptacle had a socket for a square drive which gave me more purchase than a Philips driver. Next time I will invest in a Hubble.The Hubbell and Bryant outlets have v shaped wire clamps which hold the wire much tighter than the screw or flat plate of the cheaper ones.
For those in the market, Grainger had a good price on the Bryant when I did mine - same as the Hubble for less.Good to know. I use ferrules with stranded wire and the Leviton receptacle had a socket for a square drive which gave me more purchase than a Philips driver. Next time I will invest in a Hubble.
That's not too surprising. A number of people have had to replace their outlet boxes with bigger ones when upgrading from the cheaper Leviton to the Hubbell.I am looking at https://www.amazon.com/dp/B09PTHFZVX and Amazon.com but there are some comments that they don't work with HBL9450A.
The use case here is that the outlet will be outside a garage door opening to a city sidewalk (so that the car can be charged when parked in front of the garage). The disconnect will be in a protected and locked area so that I don't have to go all the way to the electrical panel to turn power on/off.Why have the disconnect? When there is a plug and a receptacle those items satisfy any requirement for electrical equipment service disconnect.
The Tesla Wall Connector is slim, arguably more attractive and would be a better alternative than a 14-50R with a weather enclosure for an outdoor installation. (You can set the Wall Connector to only recognize, enable charging of specific Tesla vehicle VINs.) The Tesla Gen3 Wall Connector installation manual states that a service disconnect is not required. The Gen3 Wall Connector can be configured to work on a 240V circuit rated from 15A up to 60A.