Todd Burch
14-Year Member
No, no, no. This is exactly what leads to "what were they thinking" monday morning quarterbacking. If they did a savings financial analysis, it would have been for San Francisco Electricity rates (which are far out of the norm) and CA incentives. That makes sense for the audience but it would be a global corner case. That would be like the Model S pricing calculators they put on the website and got so much crap for. The audience for the home model are people who want to get solar because they want to save money and be green but don't like the utility of essentially having to sell back the power they generate. if your utility buys your overgeneration at retail rates, they ARE your battery and you don't need this. For the rest of us, this makes solar interesting for the first time.
That's fine. Then do an example for a case where someone wants to get solar to save money. I just think that the typical homeowner seeing this...or more importantly the typical journalist covering this event--will have no idea how to interpret its significance based on the presentation, because journalists are not engineers. Journalists need some numbers and examples to relate to what they're seeing. The utility companies will instantly get it. They're sold, I'm sure.
And there were a lot of numbers regarding capacity and number needed to power the world...but this needs to be sold to homeowners and businesses as well. I think many of those potential customers were probably left with big questions after the presentation.