bonnie
I play a nice person on twitter.
I think one point negative isn't going to be a big difference either way. I've been ding'ed negatively by several posters, everything from me pointing out legitimate insurance and liability issues related to certain aftermarket charging products, to expressing my concern with certain ideological elements of the Church of Climate Change, to my stated belief that you should give Tesla a chance to correct any defects voluntarily before running to the government to tattle. I take it in stride - and as you can see by the 4 green bars, there are many who give positive reputation, too.
The only thing I'll encourage is to make the anonymous cowards' feedback into noise. When you can, if you see a good, well thought out or helpful post, give positive feedback.
Exactly. While I've received plenty of positive rep, the amount of negative rep I've also received has been stellar. (Especially fun when it's all for the same post.) It all evens out with time. I've also noticed that most people who give negative reputation have very little 'reputation power', meaning they can't really impact me all that much. And some have zero reputation power (meaning it has a little gray box next to it).
I don't think people really notice someone's reputation level or care. Someone with a low level might be a new member or just doesn't post that much. But I do wish that negative feedback wasn't anonymous.